FOX News was hardly likely to provide a welcoming platform for Vice President Kamala Harris. During her investigation, she was asked about several of America’s most pressing concerns and talking points: gender-affirming surgeries, President Joe Biden’s mental acuity, and the possibility of war with Iran. Following her responses, she faced robust scrutiny on her handling of immigration issues and the US-Mexico border.
Under Harris’s presidential campaign, the Democratic Party has made a notable shift to the right – specifically on immigration issues – as she campaigned from a more centrist position.
She chose not to champion the benefits of immigration or the immigrant community itself, instead relinquishing her role as a key player in shaping the conversation. The discussion has overlooked any nods to the nation’s immigrant heritage and the inherent value of those who arrived, regardless of their legal status at the time? Without explicitly endorsing Donald Trump’s policy on mass deportations, the White House remained silent on its potential impact. Without explicitly acknowledging the issue, he simultaneously invokes antiquated legal principles to justify rounding up and deporting tens of millions of people living in the United States.
Harris leveraged the interview as an opportunity to further solidify her stance on immigration, carefully distancing herself from her past statements and her party’s liberal wing on the issue. Didn’t she regret her stance on immigrant-friendly policies in 2019, which allowed undocumented immigrants to apply for driver’s licenses, waive tuition fees at certain universities, and access public healthcare under a unified plan?
At that point, five years had passed; I am resolute in my commitment to complying with the relevant legislation. As he has consistently maintained throughout their discussions.
, Baier adopted up,
Harris paused before reiterating that her ticket’s position is “very clear: we must assist in implementing federal legislation, and that’s exactly what we will do.”
The pattern persisted, with Kamala Harris responding to concerns about migrant crime by shifting focus to a bipartisan border bill, deflecting scrutiny of her own alternatives. When asked whether she regretted the Biden administration’s repeal of Trump-era government orders restricting immigration, she responded similarly, noting that a bill proposed by the White House would have “fixed our immigration system.” However, she failed to mention that it also would have provided relief for certain undocumented immigrants already residing in the US.
This all for Harris. In her final week as vice president, Kamala Harris faced a challenging moment at a city hall event hosted by Univision, a leading Spanish-language media outlet. Twice, she was presented with opportunities to condemn President Trump’s mass deportation plans and empathize with attendees who had personal experiences with the devastating consequences of his policies – including families torn apart by deportation or denied access to healthcare due to their undocumented status. The senator passed over any mention of the probability, instead drawing upon her prior efforts in support of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program before shifting gears to discuss revamping the stalled bipartisan border bill.
As the nominee, she’s taken on a leadership role by headlining a national conference focused on addressing immigration issues. Since then, she has persistently advocated for a bipartisan border bill, garnering support from various progressive and liberal immigration advocacy groups within her own party. Despite the harsh rhetoric, pundits are tempering their critiques – urging unity to secure election victory and prevent an anti-immigrant Trump from dominating the administration – but this fragile accord can only hold until November 5th?
