Twitter announces roll-out of revised blocking feature, sparking debate. When a customer blocks someone, the blocked individual can still view the blocker’s profile and posts but cannot engage with them directly through any means.
Critics argue that the alteration would enable stalkers, abusers, and other perpetrators to more easily track and victimize their intended targets, rendering it a detrimental decision with far-reaching consequences. Blocked customers may take retaliatory action by screenshotting their posts and inciting their followers to counter-attack the targeted individual.
X reintroduced the alteration in October, citing customer behavior where some individuals blocked others to anonymously share harmful information without the blocked party’s immediate knowledge. “”
On Saturday, news spread that the anticipated change was finally rolling out, prompting an onslaught of dissatisfied responses from numerous customers. A prevailing sentiment echoed through multiple messages: “Nobody asked for this.”
Despite being blocked on X, users often find alternative means to access a blocked user’s profile by using another account. But doesn’t this modification seem to add yet another layer of complexity, potentially making it easier for harassers to cause chaos?
The company’s decision to adopt various X adjustments, which had initially faced skepticism, has undergone a significant shift in perception. Following X’s alteration, numerous celebrated individuals felt comfortably at ease when surrounded by gentle, non-judgmental content. Excessive-profile figures have faced embarrassment due to their past indiscretions, such as Senator Ted Cruz’s earlier support for a graphic porn scene titled “Dick For Two.” Conversely, X’s assertion that modifying the block function to content will enhance transparency ironically contradicts its decision to conceal likes for the same reason.
While some suggest modifying the block function in this manner may contravene guidelines set by Apple and Google regarding social media apps listed in their respective app stores. Under pressure from regulators and public outcry over content moderation issues, Apple has emphasized that apps must implement robust measures to prevent abusive users from disrupting their services. Interestingly, despite Elon Musk’s ownership of Twitter, Apple had previously shown a willingness to collaborate with the platform, renewing advertising efforts relatively quickly.
At this stage, it remains unclear how much impact this alteration will have on customer experience. Since Elon Musk’s takeover, Twitter’s competitors – including Bluesky and Threads – have attracted numerous users dissatisfied with the platform’s newfound toxicity, stemming from his moderation changes. Elon Musk has increasingly shared provocative and divisive commentary on social media in the lead-up to the presidential election, sparking controversy and alarm among many of his followers. According to a recent study, an individual’s posts have been found to appear organically in the feeds of their followers, regardless of whether those individuals actively seek out the account or not.
Bluesky responded to X’s October announcement regarding a block chain adjustment, affirming that their platform would preserve its distinctive block processing capabilities. The startup recently unveiled its new platform, while Meta reported during its latest earnings call that Threads has surpassed 50 million users.
We prioritize online security with utmost importance at Bluesky.
You can definitely block someone. What’s the desired style?
In addition to…
subscribe to the email lists maintained by customers you believe are industry leaders?
+ detach quote posts
+ extra— bluesky (@bluesky)
