Saturday, June 7, 2025

The Startup Alternative with Gabriela de Queiroz – O’Reilly

Generative AI in the Real World

Generative AI within the Actual World

Generative AI within the Actual World: The Startup Alternative with Gabriela de Queiroz



Loading





/

Ben Lorica and Gabriela de Queiroz, director of AI at Microsoft, discuss startups: particularly, AI startups. How do you get seen? How do you generate actual traction? What are startups doing with brokers and with protocols like MCP and A2A? And which safety points ought to startups look ahead to, particularly in the event that they’re utilizing open weights fashions?

Try different episodes of this podcast on the O’Reilly studying platform.

Concerning the Generative AI within the Actual World podcast: In 2023, ChatGPT put AI on everybody’s agenda. In 2025, the problem shall be turning these agendas into actuality. In Generative AI within the Actual World, Ben Lorica interviews leaders who’re constructing with AI. Study from their expertise to assist put AI to work in your enterprise.

Factors of Curiosity

  • 0:00: Introduction to Gabriela de Queiroz, director of AI at Microsoft.
  • 0:30: You’re employed with plenty of startups and founders. How have the alternatives for startups in generative AI modified? Are the alternatives increasing?
  • 0:56: Completely. The entry barrier for founders and builders is way decrease. Startups are exploding—not simply the quantity but in addition the attention-grabbing issues they’re doing.
  • 1:19: You catch startups after they’re nonetheless exploring, making an attempt to construct their MVP. So startups must be extra persistent in looking for differentiation. If anybody can construct an MVP, how do you distinguish your self?
  • 1:46: At Microsoft, I drive a number of strategic initiatives to assist growth-stage startups. I additionally information them in fixing actual ache factors utilizing our stacks. I’ve designed applications to highlight founders. 
  • 3:08: I do plenty of engagement the place I assist startups go from the prototype or MVP to impression. An MVP isn’t sufficient. I must see an actual use case and I must see some traction. After they have actual prospects, we see whether or not their MVP is working.
  • 3:49: Are you beginning to see patterns for gaining traction? Are they specializing in a selected area? Or have they got a superb dataset?
  • 4:02: If they’re fixing an actual use case in a selected area or area of interest, that is the place we see them succeed. They’re fixing an actual ache, not constructing one thing generic. 
  • 4:27: We’re each in San Francisco, and fixing a selected ache or discovering a selected area means one thing completely different. Techie founders can construct one thing that’s utilized by their mates, however there’s no income.
  • 5:03: This occurs all over the place, however there’s an even bigger tradition round that right here. I inform founders, “It’s essential present me traction.” We now have a number of corporations that began as open supply, then they constructed a paid layer on prime of the open supply venture.
  • 5:34: You’re employed with the parents at Azure, so presumably you already know what precise enterprises are doing with generative AI. Are you able to give us an thought of what enterprises are beginning to deploy? What’s the degree of consolation of enterprise with these applied sciences?
  • 6:06: Enterprises are a bit of bit behind startups. Startups are constructing brokers. Enterprises will not be there but. There’s plenty of heavy lifting on the info infrastructure that they should have in place. And their use circumstances are advanced. It’s just like Huge Knowledge, the place the enterprise took longer to optimize their stack.
  • 7:19: Are you able to describe why enterprises must modernize their knowledge stack? 
  • 7:42: Actuality isn’t magic. There’s plenty of complexity in knowledge and the way knowledge is dealt with. There may be plenty of knowledge safety and privateness that startups aren’t conscious of however are essential to enterprises. Even the sorts of knowledge—the info isn’t nicely organized, there are completely different groups utilizing completely different knowledge sources.
  • 8:28: Is RAG now a well-established sample within the enterprise?
  • 8:44: It’s. RAG is a part of everyone’s workflow.
  • 8:51: The frequent use circumstances that appear to be additional alongside are buyer help, coding—what different buckets are you able to add?
  • 9:07: Buyer help and tickets are among the many important pains and use circumstances. And they’re very costly. So it’s a simple win for enterprises after they transfer to GenAI or AI brokers. 
  • 9:48: Are you saying that the device builders are forward of the device patrons?
  • 10:05: You’re proper. I discuss lots with startups constructing brokers. We talk about the place the trade is heading and what the challenges are. In the event you suppose we’re near AGI, attempt to construct an agent and also you’ll see how far we’re from AGI. While you wish to scale, there’s one other degree of problem. Once I ask for actual examples and prospects, the bulk will not be there but.
  • 11:01: A part of it’s the terminology. Individuals use the time period “agent” even for a chatbot. There’s plenty of confusion. And startups are hyping the notion of multiagents. We are going to get there, however let’s begin with single brokers first. And you continue to want a human within the loop. 
  • 11:40: Sure, we discuss concerning the human within the loop on a regular basis. Even people who find themselves bragging, while you ask them to indicate you, they’re not there but.
  • 12:00: On the agent entrance, if I requested you for a brief presentation with three slides of examples that caught your consideration, what would they be?
  • 12:30: There’s an organization doing an AI agent with emails and your calendar. Everybody makes use of e-mail and calendars all day lengthy. If we wish to schedule dinner with a gaggle of mates, however we now have folks with dietary restrictions, it could take eternally to discover a restaurant that checks all of the packing containers. There’s an organization making an attempt to make this automated.
  • 14:22: In latest months, builders have rallied round MCP and now A2A. Somebody requested me for an inventory of vetted MCP servers. If the server comes from the corporate that developed the applying, effective. However there are literally thousands of servers, and I’m cautious. We have already got software program provide chain points. Is MCP taking off, or is it a brief repair?
  • 15:48: It’s too early to say that that is it. There’s additionally the Google protocol (A2A); IBM created a protocol; that is an ongoing dialogue, and since it’s evolving so quick, one thing will most likely come within the subsequent few months.
  • 16:31: It’s very very similar to the web and the requirements that emerged from there. You may make it formal, or you may simply construct it, develop it, and by some means it turns into an empirical open customary.
  • 17:15: We’re implicitly speaking about textual content. Have you ever began to see near-production use circumstances involving multimodal fashions?
  • 17:37: We’ve seen some use circumstances with multimodality, which is extra advanced.
  • 17:48: Now it’s important to broaden your knowledge technique to all these completely different knowledge varieties.
  • 18:07: Going again to the slides: If I had three slides, I’d attempt to get everybody on the identical web page about what an AI agent is. All the large corporations have their very own definitions. I’d set the stage with my definition: a system that may take motion in your half. Then I’d say, in case you suppose we’re near AGI, attempt to construct an agent. And the third slide can be to construct one agent, somewhat than a multiagent. Begin small, after which you may scale, not the opposite method round.
  • 19:44: Orchestration of 1 agent is one factor. Lots of people throw across the time period orchestration. For knowledge engineering, orchestration means one thing particular, and lots goes into it, even for a single agent. For multiagents, it’s much more advanced. There’s orchestration and there’s communication too. An agent could withhold, ignore, or misunderstand data. So stick to one agent. Get that carried out and transfer ahead.
  • 20:33: The large factor within the foundational mannequin area is reasoning. What has reasoning opened up for a few of these startups? What purposes depend on a reasoning-enhanced mannequin? What mannequin ought to I take advantage of, and may I get by with a mannequin that doesn’t purpose?
  • 21:15: I haven’t seen any startup utilizing reasoning but. Most likely due to what you’re speaking about. It’s costly, it’s slower, and startups must see wins quick. 
  • 21:46: They simply ask for extra free credit.
  • 21:51: Free credit will not be eternally. However it’s not even the fee—it’s additionally the method and the ready. What are the trade-offs? I haven’t seen startups speaking with me about utilizing reasoning.
  • 22:22: The sound recommendation for anybody constructing something is to be mannequin agnostic. Design what you’re doing so you should use a number of fashions or swap fashions. We now have open weights fashions which are turning into extra aggressive. Final 12 months we had Llama; now we even have Qwen and DeepSeek, with an unimaginable launch cadence. Are you seeing extra startups choosing open weights?
  • 23:19: Undoubtedly. However they must be very cautious after they use open fashions due to safety. I see plenty of corporations utilizing DeepSeek. I ask them about safety.
  • 23:43: Within the open weights world, you may have by-product fashions. Who vets the derivatives? Proprietary fashions have much more management. And there’s provide chain dangers, although they’re not distinctive to the open weights fashions. All of us rely upon Python and Python libraries.
  • 25:17: And with folks forking by-product fashions. . . We’ve seen this with merchandise as nicely; folks constructing merchandise and being worthwhile on prime of open supply initiatives. Individuals constructed on a fork of a Python venture or prime of Python libraries and [became] worthwhile. 
  • 25:55: With the Chinese language open weights fashions, I’ve talked to safety folks, and there’s nothing inherently insecure about utilizing the weights. There could be architectural variations. However in case you’re utilizing one of many Chinese language fashions of their open API, they could have to show over knowledge. Typically, entry to the weights isn’t a typical assault vector.
  • 27:03: Or you should use corporations like Microsoft. We now have DeepSeek R1 accessible on Azure. However it’s gone by rigorous red-teaming and security analysis to mitigate dangers. 
  • 27:39: There are variations by way of alignment and red-teaming between Western and Chinese language corporations.
  • 28:26: In closing, are there any parallels between what you’re seeing now and what we noticed in knowledge science?
  • 28:40: It’s comparable, however the scale and velocity are completely different. There are extra sources and accessibility. The barrier to entry is decrease. 
  • 29:06: The hype cycle is identical. You keep in mind all of the tales about “Knowledge science is the attractive new job.” However the know-how is now way more accessible, and there are much more tales and extra pleasure.
  • 29:29: Again then, we solely had a number of choices: Hadoop, Spark. . . Not like 100 completely different fashions. They usually weren’t accessible to most people. 
  • 30:03: Again then folks didn’t want Hadoop or MapReduce or Spark in the event that they didn’t have numerous knowledge. And now, you don’t have to make use of the brightest or best-benchmarked LLM; you should use a small language mannequin.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles