The advertising and marketing campaign for the latest OnePlus Watch 2R repositions it as a sleek, long-lasting wearable running Google’s Put on OS, designed to inspire individuals to live an active lifestyle; its lighter design makes it perfect for those who value all-day health monitoring. While I’m drawn to personalized timepieces, my peers were underwhelmed by the OnePlus Watch 2’s health tracking features, deeming them a significant shortcoming. After conducting my own investigation into the Watch 2R’s precision,
A reviewer, Harish, criticized our device for being “unreliable” in tracking daily step counts or exercise monitoring, inaccurately estimating energy expenditure following workouts, and providing artificially inflated stress levels.
Meanwhile, my colleague Nick conducted research that yielded similar findings, with numerous participants reporting underestimation of step counts and significant decreases in HR numbers during anaerobic exercise sessions. It seemed likely to Nick and Harish that the watch utilized its low-power real-time operating system (RTOS) coprocessor to manage well-being and health sampling, which they assumed was too slow or inconsistent to provide accurate readings.
This initial skepticism towards testing the OnePlus Watch 2R, a device purporting to prioritize health monitoring, only intensified as I considered its potential limitations in this regard. I compared my performance during the final week by wearing two smartwatches, one being the new Watch 2R and the other my trusty Garmin Forerunner 965, to see how well the Watch 2R would compete with its rival in terms of heart rate monitoring and dual-band GPS accuracy.
What’s my OnePlus Watch 2R health data telling me?
Despite OnePlus’ OHealth companion app’s limitations, it failed to export TCX/GPX records like Samsung Health, causing issues in transmitting data accurately, thereby preventing the creation of standard HR or GPS charts for direct comparison, and subsequently, using tables as an alternative for now is necessary.
Run #1 | OnePlus Watch 2R | Garmin Forerunner 965 |
---|---|---|
Distance | 3.05 miles | 3.09 miles |
Avg. / Max HR | 146 bpm / 159 bpm | 147 bpm / 158 bpm |
Cadence | 161 steps per minute | 162 steps per minute |
Stride size | 3.28 ft | 3.35 ft |
Avg. Vertical Ratio | 8.8% | 8.7% |
Avg. floor contact time | 301ms | 283ms |
Burned energy | 318kcal | 421kcal |
On its inaugural outing, the OnePlus Watch 2R maintained precise sync with the Garmin Forerunner 965.
I verified coronary heart rates across ten distinct time points and found that the 2R matches the reference rate in four instances, while being one beat per minute faster in six instances, consistent with the established one-bpm lower average.
The GPS system’s overall accuracy has consistently maintained a stable standard. While it’s challenging to definitively declare whether OnePlus’ dual-band accuracy surpasses Garmin’s, my experience led me to observe that both mapping systems occasionally veered off course, despite navigating through dense foliage.
The OnePlus Watch 2R demonstrated reasonably accurate operating dynamics, with stride size and vertical ratio syncing effectively. However, it underestimated vertical oscillation by 1 centimeter and overestimated floor contact time by 18 milliseconds, highlighting some potential inconsistencies in its tracking capabilities.
Run #2 | OnePlus Watch 2R | Garmin Forerunner 965 |
---|---|---|
Distance | 3,315 meters | 3,220 meters |
Avg. / Max HR | 174 bpm / 191 bpm | 176 bpm / 191 bpm |
Cadence | 180 steps per minute | 174 steps per minute |
Stride size | 4.42 ft | 4.43 ft |
Avg. Vertical Ratio | 6.0% | 6.6% |
Avg. floor contact time | 241ms | 223ms |
Burned energy | 194kcal | 229kcal |
During my second observation run, I completed eight 400-meter laps, with Garmin accurately tracking my progress by utilizing stored course maps to estimate my likely location. OnePlus Watch 2R consistently vibrated my wrist around the 350-meter mark during laps or miles, frequently. The initial coordinates were woefully off-kilter, but a single miscalculated step sent the GPS into hyper-accuracy mode, rendering any further corrections moot. Notwithstanding this, it still managed to throw my calculated tempo significantly off track.
While I anticipated the Galaxy Watch Extreme to accurately track my heart rate during a high-intensity workout, it surprisingly fell short of the mark, with the center fee being more accurate. The device consistently underperformed Garmin’s specifications, typically lagging by 1-3 beats per minute at any given moment; yet, it often settled into the correct range with sufficient time. Clearly, the Apple Watch Series 2R outperformed its predecessor, the Apple Watch Series 2, in this particular regard.
OnePlus’ operating system dynamics differed subtly from those of Garmin. I don’t fully understand how OnePlus claimed that I took extra steps per minute while keeping my feet on the floor for a longer period? Despite completing my run, I noticed a discrepancy: OHealth had recorded my height as 5’7″ – I’m actually 6’1″ tall. This potential inaccuracy might have influenced outcomes related to vertical oscillation. Regardless, , in my view.
The OnePlus Watch 2R has left me thoroughly impressed with its health monitoring features. The watch’s continuous heart rate monitoring and blood oxygen level tracking have provided me with a deeper understanding of my physiological state throughout the day. I’ve been able to monitor my stress levels and make adjustments accordingly, which has had a noticeable impact on my overall wellbeing.
While it’s possible that my expectations might have been overly optimistic, the OnePlus Watch 2R genuinely seems to offer impressive value at its price point. The device’s compact design belies its substantial presence, boasting a three-day battery life, seamless integration with Put on OS 4, and the added convenience of Google Assistant – all for a competitive $229 price tag that would normally be expected from an Amazfit watch, yet falls short in terms of app support.
The Health app provides comprehensive and easily digestible insights into exercise performance, offering in-depth explanations of statistics such as coaching influence, operating mechanics, VO2 Max, and recovery time – though Garmin requires a one-day delay and reports slightly lower values for me.
While it has its advantages, the app remains largely basic compared to other tie-in health applications. While OHealth provides an abundance of personal health information, its long-term training data and exercise summaries remain superficially elementary. While using the Watch 2R in the long term, I would undoubtedly synchronize my data with Strava and rely heavily on its alternative for tracking and analysis.
Revisiting my colleagues’ concerns about the OnePlus Watch 2, I found that my final total steps taken during each wear were 11,670 for the Garmin Forerunner 965 and 11,560 for the OnePlus Watch 2R.
Since Garmin watches outperform every other model in my collection, I will manage the first batch as a correct management team. Approximately 100 steps deviate from the total 11,000 steps, effectively akin to a minor rounding discrepancy, and significantly higher than the misstep margin of the OnePlus Watch 2 versus The spacecraft traveled the identical distance of approximately 1,860 kilometers. Here is the rewritten text:
In this latest comparison, I put the Galaxy Watch Extremely through its paces against the Forerunner 965, with a rigorous test of 10,000 steps – including a brisk 348-step sprint.
While OnePlus may have underestimated my caloric expenditure compared to Garmin, it’s worth noting that discrepancies often arise when comparing data from different wearable brands. Here’s a rewritten version in a more polished style:
“I’m unclear about the intricacies of that algorithm. Can I gain insight on how to determine which ones amplify or accelerate my growth quickly?” I’m unconcerned about the disparity in estimates between our company and OnePlus, as the latter’s forecast is likely an overstatement given its track record of conservative projections.
Actually, my greatest criticism of the OnePlus Watch 2R is similar to the one I have with the Galaxy Watch Ultra: the. On the OnePlus Watch 2, a redundant spinning crown takes center stage, offering no functional utility, unlike the Watch 2’s intuitive dual-button design, where one button seamlessly accesses exercises by default, requiring only a simple customization to assign a new purpose? Despite my understanding of your perspective, the visibly perspiring exercise attire in the accompanying images should logically demonstrate why I refrain from relying on swiping gestures during workouts. I’ll take control, please! Give me up/down buttons or a crown any day?
Can I request additional time to thoroughly review the OnePlus Watch 2R’s wellness and sleep tracking features? While I’m now more optimistic about its potential value for casual athletes, I still question whether it’s truly worth the investment.
The OnePlus Watch 2R boasts a powerful Snapdragon W5 processor, a 500mAh battery that provides all-day performance, a compact yet clear 1.43-inch display, dual-band GPS for precise location tracking, NFC capabilities for seamless tap-to-pay transactions, integration with Google Assistant for hands-free control, and comprehensive post-run metrics to help users optimize their workouts. While lacking the trendiness of the Watch 2, this model is significantly lighter, more affordable, and appears to forgo heart rate monitoring features.