—Joshua A. Basseches is the David and Jane Flowerree Assistant Professor of Environmental Research and Public Coverage at Tulane College.
The second Trump administration is proving to be extra disastrous for the local weather and the clear vitality financial system than many had feared.
Donald Trump’s One Massive Stunning Invoice Act repealed a lot of the clear vitality incentives in former president Joe Biden’s Inflation Discount Act. In the meantime, his EPA administrator has moved to revoke the endangerment discovering, the authorized foundation for federal oversight of greenhouse gases.
This has left many within the local weather and clear vitality communities questioning what will we do now? The reply, I’d argue, is to return to state capitals—a policymaking venue that local weather and renewable vitality advocates already know properly. Learn the complete story.
This story is a part of MIT Know-how Assessment’s Warmth Change visitor opinion collection, providing skilled commentary on authorized, political and regulatory points associated to local weather change and clear vitality. You’ll be able to learn the remainder of the items right here.
Ought to AI flatter us, repair us, or simply inform us?
How would you like your AI to deal with you?
It’s a severe query, and it’s one which Sam Altman, OpenAI’s CEO, has clearly been chewing on since GPT-5’s bumpy launch in the beginning of the month.
He faces a trilemma. Ought to ChatGPT flatter us, on the threat of fueling delusions that may spiral out of hand? Or repair us, which requires us to imagine AI could be a therapist regardless of the proof on the contrary? Or ought to it inform us with chilly, to-the-point responses that will depart customers bored and fewer more likely to keep engaged?
It’s secure to say the corporate has failed to select a lane, and if these are certainly AI’s choices, the rockiness of this newest replace is perhaps as a result of Altman believing ChatGPT can juggle all three. Learn the complete story.
