I believed I’d provide just a few takeaways and reflections primarily based on final week’s first AI Codecon digital convention, Coding with AI: The Finish of Software program Growth as We Know It. I’m additionally going to incorporate just a few brief video excerpts from the occasion. In the event you registered for Coding with AI or in the event you’re an current O’Reilly subscriber, you may watch or rewatch the entire thing on the O’Reilly studying platform. In the event you aren’t a subscriber but, it’s straightforward to begin a free trial. We’ll even be posting extra excerpts on the O’Reilly YouTube channel within the subsequent few weeks.
However on to the promised takeaways.
First off, Harper Reed is a mad genius who made everybody’s head explode. (Camille Fournier apparently has joked that Harper has rotted his mind with AI, and Harper truly agreed.) Harper mentioned his design course of in a chat that you simply would possibly wish to run at half velocity. His greenfield workflow is to start out with an thought. Give your thought to a chat mannequin and have it ask you questions with sure/no solutions. Have it extract all of the concepts. That turns into your spec or PRD. Use the spec as enter to a reasoning mannequin and have it generate a plan; then feed that plan into a distinct reasoning mannequin and have it generate prompts for code technology for each the applying and exams. He’s having a wild time.
Agile Manifesto coauthor Kent Beck was additionally on Workforce Enthusiasm. He instructed us that augmented coding with AI was “essentially the most enjoyable I’ve ever had,” and stated that it “reawakened the enjoyment of programming.” Nikola Balic agreed: “As Kent stated, it simply introduced the enjoyment of writing code, the enjoyment of programming, it introduced it again. So I’m now producing extra code than ever. I’ve, like, 1,000,000 strains of code within the final month. I’m enjoying with stuff that I by no means performed with earlier than. And I’m simply spending an obscene quantity of tokens.” However sooner or later, “I believe that we received’t write code anymore. We are going to nurture it. This can be a imaginative and prescient. I’m positive that lots of you’ll disagree however let’s look years sooner or later and the way all the things will change. I believe that we’re extra going towards intention-driven programming.”
Others, like Chelsea Troy, Chip Huyen, swyx, Birgitta Böckeler, and Gergely Orosz weren’t so positive. Don’t get me mistaken. They suppose that there’s a ton of fantastic stuff to do and be taught. However there’s additionally quite a lot of hype and free pondering. And whereas there will probably be quite a lot of change, quite a lot of current abilities will stay necessary.
Right here’s Chelsea’s critique of the latest paper that claimed a 26% productiveness improve for builders utilizing generative AI.
If Chelsea will do a sermon each week within the Church of Don’t Consider Every little thing You Learn that consists of her displaying off varied papers and giving her dry and insightful perspective on how to consider them extra clearly, I’m so there.
I used to be a bit shocked by how skeptical Chip Huyen and swyx have been about A2A. They actually schooled me on the notion that the way forward for brokers is in direct AI-to-AI interactions. I’ve been of the opinion that having an AI agent work the user-facing interface of a distant web site is a throwback to display scraping—absolutely a transitional stage—and whereas calling an API will probably be one of the best ways to deal with a deterministic course of like fee, there will probably be a complete lot of different actions, like style matching, that are perfect for LLM to LLM. After I take into consideration AI looking for instance, I think about an agent that has discovered and remembered my tastes and preferences and particular objectives speaking with an agent that is aware of and understands the stock of a service provider. However swyx and Chip weren’t shopping for it, at the least not now. They suppose that’s a good distance off, given the present state of AI engineering. I used to be glad to have them deliver me again to earth.
(For what it’s value, Gabriela de Queiroz, director of AI at Microsoft, agrees. On her episode of O’Reilly’s Generative AI within the Actual World podcast, she stated, “In the event you suppose we’re near AGI, strive constructing an agent, and also you’ll see how far we’re from AGI.”)
Angie Jones, however, was fairly enthusiastic about brokers in her lightning discuss about how MCP is bringing the “mashup” period again to life. I used to be struck particularly by Angie’s feedback about MCP as a type of common adapter, which abstracts away the underlying particulars of APIs, instruments, and information sources. That was a robust echo of Microsoft’s platform dominance within the Home windows period, which in some ways started with the Win32 API, which abstracted away all of the underlying {hardware} such that utility writers not needed to write drivers for disk drives, printers, screens, or communications ports. I’d name {that a} energy transfer by Anthropic, aside from the blessing that they launched MCP as an open customary. Good for them!
Birgitta Böckeler talked frankly about how LLMs helped scale back cognitive load and helped suppose by means of a design. However a lot of our day by day work is a poor match for AI: massive legacy codebases the place we alter extra code than we create, antiquated expertise stacks, poor suggestions loops. We nonetheless want code that’s easy and modular—that’s simpler for LLMs to grasp, in addition to people. We nonetheless want good suggestions loops that present us whether or not code is working (echoing Harper). We nonetheless want logical, analytical, vital eager about downside fixing. On the finish, she summarized each poles of the convention, saying we want cultures that reward each experimentation and skepticism.
Gergely Orosz weighed in on the continued significance of software program engineering. He talked briefly about books he was studying, beginning with Chip Huyen’s AI Engineering, however maybe the extra necessary level got here a bit later: He held up a number of software program engineering classics, together with The Legendary Man-Month and Code Full. These books are a long time outdated, Gergely famous, however even with 50 years of instrument growth, the issues they describe are nonetheless with us. AI isn’t more likely to change that.
On this regard, I used to be struck by Camille Fournier’s assertion that managers like to see their senior builders utilizing AI instruments, as a result of they’ve the abilities and judgment to get essentially the most out of it, however usually wish to take it away from junior builders who can use it too uncritically. Addy Osmani expressed the priority that primary abilities (“muscle reminiscence”) would degrade, each for junior and senior software program builders. (Juniors might by no means develop these abilities within the first place.) Addy’s remark was echoed by many others. No matter the way forward for computing holds, we nonetheless have to know learn how to analyze an issue, how to consider information and information constructions, learn how to design, and learn how to debug.
In that very same dialogue, Maxi Ferreira and Avi Flombaum introduced up the critique that LLMs will have a tendency to decide on the most typical languages and frameworks when making an attempt to resolve an issue, even when there are higher instruments obtainable. This can be a variation of the remark that LLMs by default have a tendency to provide a consensus answer. However the dialogue highlighted for me that this represents a danger to talent acquisition and studying of up-and-coming builders too. It additionally made me surprise about the way forward for programming languages. Why develop new languages if there’s by no means going to be sufficient coaching information for LLMs to make use of them?
Virtually the entire audio system talked concerning the significance of up-front design when programming with AI. Harper Reed stated that this seems like a return to waterfall, besides that the cycle is so quick. Clay Shirky as soon as noticed that waterfall growth “quantities to a pledge by all events to not be taught something whereas doing the precise work,” and that failure to be taught whereas doing has hampered numerous tasks. But when AI codegen is waterfall with a quick studying cycle, that’s a really completely different mannequin. So this is a vital thread to tug on.
Lili Jiang’s closing emphasis that evals are rather more advanced with LLMs actually resonated for me, and was in line with lots of the audio system’ takes about how a lot additional we have now to go. Lili in contrast a knowledge science challenge she had finished at Quora, the place they began with a fastidiously curated dataset (which made eval comparatively straightforward), with making an attempt to cope with self-driving algorithms at Waymo, the place you don’t begin out with “floor fact” and the correct reply is extremely context dependent. She requested, “How do you consider an LLM given such a excessive diploma of freedom when it comes to its output?” and identified that the code to do evals correctly will be as massive or bigger than the code used to form the precise performance.
This completely suits with my sense of why anybody imagining a programmer-free future is out of contact. AI makes some issues that was once exhausting trivially straightforward and a few issues that was once straightforward a lot, a lot more durable. Even in the event you had an LLM as decide doing the evals, there’s an terrible lot to be found out.
I wish to end with Kent Beck’s considerate perspective on how completely different mindsets are wanted at completely different levels within the evolution of a brand new market.
Lastly, a giant THANK YOU to everybody who gave their time to be a part of our first AI Codecon occasion. Addy Osmani, you have been the right cohost. You’re educated, a fantastic interviewer, charming, and quite a lot of enjoyable to work with. Gergely Orosz, Kent Beck, Camille Fournier, Avi Flombaum, Maxi Ferreira, Harper Reed, Jay Parikh, Birgitta Böckeler, Angie Jones, Craig McLuckie, Patty O’Callaghan, Chip Huyen, swyx Wang, Andrew Stellman, Iyanuoluwa Ajao, Nikola Balic, Brett Smith, Chelsea Troy, Lili Jiang—you all rocked. Thanks a lot for sharing your experience. Melissa Duffield, Julie Baron, Lisa LaRew, Keith Thompson, Yasmina Greco, Derek Hakim, Sasha Divitkina, and everybody else at O’Reilly who helped deliver AI Codecon to life, thanks for all of the work you place in to make the occasion a hit. And because of the just about 9,000 attendees who gave your time, your consideration, and your provocative questions within the chat.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel to observe highlights from the occasion or change into an O’Reilly member to observe your entire convention earlier than the following one September 9. We’d love to listen to what landed for you—tell us within the feedback.
