I’m personally pro-tech and use AI daily. I’m genuinely excited by progressive instruments that increase what creators and companies can do.
However the tempo of what’s occurring — and how it’s being rolled out — has been eye-jarring: creators sidelined, copyright murky at greatest, implementation racing forward of consent.
Proper now it looks like a land-grab: who can transfer quicker, get bigger, study extra, prepare extra — too typically at society’s expense.
That’s the backdrop to the ultimate keynote at SXSW Sydney 2025, a fireplace interview the place OpenAI’s chief of worldwide affairs (ie. geopolitical danger administration boss), Chris Lehane, was interviewed by the AFR’s Paul Smith.
Lehane supplied a sophisticated imaginative and prescient of “the age of intelligence” and a greater world in 25 years. The subtext: historical past exhibits every revolution trumps the final, so adaptation is everybody’s duty — and for those who don’t adapt, that’s on you.
Listed here are the largest takeaways — and why I’m not totally shopping for the story after we can design higher world floor up from the start.
OpenAI’s Chris Lehane
Lehane talked about “democratising AI,” but OpenAI’s fashions are skilled on the work of tens of millions of creators with out consent — writers, designers, journalists, musicians — whose expertise at the moment are quietly being automated, their livelihoods eroded. The corporate frames this as a mistake, or a matter of authorized interpretation.
The sample is evident: take first, apologise later.
He assured the viewers that OpenAI will create extra new jobs, not destroy them — that each technological leap has executed so.
“To not be Pollyannaish,” he added, earlier than acknowledging that, sure, some individuals will be displaced. However to not fear, there will probably be new “marketplaces” for coaching, certifications, and “AI literacy.”
In different phrases, the identical firm that disrupted your business will now promote you the toolkit to outlive in it.
It’s a intelligent sleight of hand — an ethical outsourcing. Governments should determine learn how to regulate. Societies should adapt. Employees should retrain.
OpenAI simply builds the instruments. And if the world struggles to catch up, properly, that’s not their fault.
Lehane’s optimism stretched 25 years into the long run.
By then, he stated, AI may have cured most cancers, solved schooling, and powered abundance.
Everybody will “reside the great life.”
However there’s a darker query lurking beneath that imaginative and prescient: what occurs when the subsequent technology now not learns how to do issues? When each act of creation, restore, or discovery is lowered to a voice command or a immediate?
Will we nonetheless know learn how to construct, educate, or write, or will these expertise quietly vanish, outsourced to invisible methods we now not perceive? If AI turns into the hand that paints, the voice that sings, the thoughts that solves — what, then, turns into of ours?
Lehane spoke of human-led design, of placing individuals on the centre of this transformation. However to date, humanity hasn’t been main; it’s been reacting.
The roles are already disappearing. The talents hole is widening. The methods are studying quicker than the individuals they’re alleged to serve.
Because the lights dimmed, the group clapped and laughed, not out of awe, however irony. After Smith’s push for actual solutions on copyright and AI’s influence, all he obtained was hope.
When he closed with “we hope the world will get higher,” the room knew that was all they’d been given.
OpenAI’s imaginative and prescient guarantees a greater world — if we simply belief them, if we simply sustain. But each revolution has its value. And earlier than we let one other wave of “innovation” wash over us, maybe the true query isn’t what AI will create — however what it can take alongside the way in which.
- George Hedon is the founding father of Pause Fest and the Pause Awards.
