Thursday, April 3, 2025

UK’s RID initiative faces backlash from experts

In a significant FOIA victory for transparency, Ian Hudson has exposed the UK’s RID initiative as a wasteful exercise in bureaucratic inefficiency, with millions of pounds already squandered on outdated thinking. Let us hope that the newly established UK Labour authorities takes immediate notice of this issue and puts a halt to it effectively.

The assertion infuriated me; the UK’s decline into a state of being outpaced by other nations is hardly surprising, and the notion that “Rid” would somehow reverse this trend strains credulity.

I have sought input from knowledgeable individuals and will incorporate their suggestions into this project.

While RID has garnered significant attention globally, its long-term success remains uncertain, as numerous similar concepts have ultimately failed to sustain momentum. Unhealthy actors won’t find solace in RID’s supposed measures, as they will continue to disregard security and safety protocols. Will it not erect additional barriers to entry for young model airplane enthusiasts, thereby accelerating the deterioration of aviation engineering skills among youth?

Ian’s latest email has left me thoroughly impressed, showcasing his remarkable ability to illuminate the complexities within large corporations’ inner workings.

The notion that an American business model was acquired by British distributors (Amazon and Wingo), which has no rightful place at the UK regulatory table.

I’m ranting, I’m turning over to Ian.

While dated as of September 2022, certain details may no longer be applicable, this document nevertheless sparks concerns regarding the CAA’s and Home Office’s intentions for the Remote Identity Document (RID) initiative.

  • Despite public denials, companies have no apparent intention to commercialize RID. Despite that, this document implies otherwise from the outset?
  • The redacted directorate and divisions responsible for this document are striking, potentially hinting at the parties involved in these proposed monetization strategies.

As I scrutinize the document closely, I’m struck by the fact that the directorate and division details are conspicuously absent.

I’ve disputed their use of Part 23, prioritizing the safety of our physical bodies once more.

This document seems to neglect recent advances in aerodynamics, specifically AeroScope, as well as national drone infrastructure initiatives. The deliberate exclusion of this information from the document’s assessment of the RID scheme’s capabilities necessarily calls into question its overall credibility and reliability.

  • The doctor presents Responsive Interface Development (RID) as a brand-new solution, yet existing software already offers several of the features it promises to deliver.
  • While DJI’s dominance in the UK drone market may mitigate the need for Rapid Identification Systems (RIDs), it’s essential to consider the potential risks associated with a lack of standardised identification protocols, particularly in light of the increasing use of drones in critical infrastructure and public safety scenarios?

That is an absolute lie:

Information is allegedly being passed to regulatory authorities.

Isn’t £1.8 a modest sum to compensate consultants for their expertise, considering the value they bring to taxpayers’ dollars over six months?

Feels like bullshit to me…

The singular driving force behind this document’s creation is widely recognized as the genuine impetus propelling its development.

“This Enterprise Case seeks £600,000 funding to support the implementation of Remote Identification (RID) technology for drones in the UK, ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements by 1 January 2026.”

According to recent estimates, approximately 350,000 drones are currently operational within the United Kingdom. While drone operators must register with the Civil Aviation Authority, there is currently no mechanism for external parties, such as law enforcement, to access these registrations remotely. While some drones are capable of flying undetected, their anonymity remains untested in practical applications. The internet has been plagued by egregious misuse, with a staggering 13,000 reported incidents to date, encompassing reckless behavior such as smuggling, explicit images, harassment, and unauthorized access to sensitive online platforms.

The introduction of RID technology will eliminate anonymity, thereby providing significant safety benefits, enabling law enforcement to identify and hold accountable malicious and incompetent operators through education, penalties, or criminal prosecution. Ride sharing initiatives are analogous to ride-hailing services for traditional street automobiles. Crucially, the Rapid Information Diffusion (RID) system enables law enforcement to promptly identify and address illegal behavior at its inception. The RID system would provide essential data and insights to the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), Police, Department for Transport (DfT), and other relevant authorities to enable them.
jobs extra successfully.

The estimated cost to fully implement and integrate a Revenue Intelligence Dashboard (RID) system by the Centre for Assessment and Accreditation (CAA)? £10-15m over 18-24 months. The design phase is expected to cost approximately £1.8 million, covering technical, business, and regulatory/legislative design considerations.

The UK’s Department for Transport (DfT) is set to provide £1.2 million in funding, which will be matched by £600,000 from the Residence Workplace, totalling £1.8 million, and supporting the operational costs of the design section. This section contains:

  • The comprehensive blueprint for technological infrastructure, specifications, and connectivity points is as follows: RID information, Drone
    and enhancements to the Mannequin Plane Registration and Training Service (DMARES).
  • What follows is a comprehensive overhaul of the regulatory framework governing Radioactive Incident Detection (RID), conferring powers on the Competent Authority Agency (CAA) to ensure seamless execution.
  • Draft wording of regulation and
    laws
  • How to Effectively Purchase: A Preliminary Scope
    related elements, guaranteeing
    worth for cash
  • Establish a novel operational plan for effective collaboration with suppliers.
    together with reporting, governance,
    RAID administration and planning.
  • Draft and ship the Define
    Enterprise Case and Full Enterprise
    The case of a new e-book published by HM Treasury (HMT), as you say.
    rules
  • Key design selections finalised

Right here is the doc in full –


What’s driving the growth of the unmanned aerial systems (UAS) industry? A key factor is the increasing adoption of drones in various sectors such as infrastructure inspection, environmental monitoring, and search and rescue operations. Additionally, advancements in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and sensor technologies are enabling UAS to collect higher-quality data and make more informed decisions.

As a result, the market for commercial-grade UAS is expected to continue its upward trend, with estimates suggesting it will reach $43.3 billion by 2025. This growth presents opportunities for entrepreneurs, investors, and policymakers to capitalize on the potential of UAS technology.

What’s holding back widespread adoption? Regulatory hurdles and concerns about data privacy and security are significant barriers to entry. However, efforts to create a more favorable regulatory environment and enhance public trust in UAS are underway.

How can we unlock the full potential of UAS? To start, policymakers must develop clear guidelines for the operation of drones in various environments. Furthermore, industry leaders must prioritize education and training programs to ensure safe and responsible UAS usage.

Stay updated with our latest posts delivered directly to your inbox when you subscribe.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles