Tuesday, April 1, 2025

Snowflake Customers Focused for Knowledge Theft and Extortion

A brand new report from Mandiant, a part of Google Cloud, reveals {that a} financially motivated risk actor named UNC5537 collected and exfiltrated information from about 165 organizations’ Snowflake buyer cases. Snowflake is a cloud information platform used for storing and analyzing giant volumes of information.

The risk actor managed to get entry to those information by triggering credentials that had been beforehand stolen by infostealer malware or bought from different cybercriminals.

In line with Mandiant, the risk actor UNC5537 advertises sufferer information on the market on cybercrime boards and makes an attempt to extort lots of the victims. When the info is bought, any cybercriminal would possibly purchase this data for various functions corresponding to cyber espionage, aggressive intelligence or extra financially-oriented fraud.

How had been some Snowflake customers focused for this information theft and extortion?

A joint assertion supplied by Snowflake, Mandiant and cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike signifies there is no such thing as a proof suggesting the fraudulent exercise can be attributable to a vulnerability, misconfiguration or breach of Snowflake’s platform. There may be additionally no proof the exercise would have been attributable to compromised credentials from present or previous Snowflake staff.

As a substitute, proof reveals the attackers obtained credentials from a number of infostealer malware campaigns that contaminated non-Snowflake owned methods. The risk actor then gained entry to the affected accounts, which allowed the exfiltration of a major quantity of buyer information from the respective Snowflake buyer cases.

Attack path diagram.
Assault path diagram. Picture: Mandiant

Mandiant researchers acknowledged the vast majority of the credentials utilized by UNC5537 had been obtainable from historic infostealer malware; a few of these credentials date again to November 2020 however had been nonetheless usable. Completely different infostealer malware households had been chargeable for the credentials theft  — essentially the most used ones being Vidar, Risepro, Redline, Racoon Stealer, Lumma and Metastealer.

In line with Mandiant and Snowflake, at the least 79.7% of the accounts leveraged by the risk actor had prior credential publicity.

Mandiant additionally reported the preliminary compromise of infostealer malware occurred on contractor methods that had been additionally used for private actions, together with gaming and downloads of pirated software program, which is a sturdy vector for spreading infostealers.

How did UNC5537 get hold of the stolen credentials?

As reported, the risk actor obtained credentials from a wide range of infostealer malware, but UNC5537 additionally leveraged credentials that had been beforehand bought.

Whereas no further data is supplied by Mandiant, it’s affordable to assume these credentials had been purchased in a single or a number of cybercriminal underground marketplaces on to so-called Preliminary Entry Brokers, that are a class of cybercriminals who promote stolen company entry to different fraudsters.

As written by Mandiant in its report, “the underground infostealer financial system can also be extraordinarily strong, and huge lists of stolen credentials exist each free of charge and for buy inside and out of doors of the darkish internet.” Mandiant additionally reported that, in 2023, 10% of general intrusions started with stolen credentials, representing the fourth most notable preliminary intrusion vector.

What was the preliminary entry and information exfiltration strategies on this Snowflake assault?

On this assault marketing campaign, the preliminary entry to Snowflake buyer cases typically occurred by way of the native person interface accessible from the online (Snowflake SnowSight) or from the command-line interface software supplied by Snowflake (SnowSQL). An extra attacker-named software known as “rapeflake” and tracked below FROSTBITE by Mandiant has been used to carry out reconnaissance in opposition to Snowflake cases.

FROSTBITE exists in at the least two variations: one utilizing .NET to work together with the Snowflake .NET driver, and one model utilizing Java to work together with the Snowflake JDBC driver. The software permits the attackers to carry out SQL actions corresponding to itemizing customers, present roles, present IP addresses, session IDs and organizations’ names.

A public software for managing databases, DBeaver Final, has additionally been utilized by the risk actor to run queries on the Snowflake cases.

Utilizing SQL queries, the risk actor was capable of exfiltrate data from databases. As soon as attention-grabbing information was discovered, it was compressed as GZIP utilizing the “COPY INTO” command to scale back the dimensions of the info to be exfiltrated.

The attacker primarily used Mullvad and Personal Web Entry VPN companies to entry the victims’ Snowflake cases. A moldovan VPS supplier, ALEXHOST SRL, was additionally used for information exfiltration. The risk actor saved sufferer information on a number of worldwide VPS suppliers, in addition to on the cloud storage supplier MEGA.

What organizations are in danger?

The assault marketing campaign seems to be a focused marketing campaign aimed toward Snowflake customers with single-factor authentication. All customers with multifactor authentication are secure from this assault marketing campaign and weren’t focused.

As well as, the impacted Snowflake buyer cases didn’t have permit lists in place to solely permit connections from trusted places.

Suggestions from Snowflake on the right way to defend what you are promoting from this cybersecurity risk

Snowflake printed data on detecting and stopping unauthorized person entry.

The corporate supplied a listing of virtually 300 suspicious IP addresses utilized by the risk actor and shared a question to determine entry from the suspect IP addresses. The corporate additionally supplied a question to determine the utilization of the “rapeflake” and “DBeaver Final” instruments. Any person account returning outcomes from these queries should instantly be disabled.

Safety hardening is very beneficial by Snowflake:

  • Implement MFA for customers.
  • Arrange account-level and user-level community insurance policies for extremely credentialed customers/companies accounts.
  • Overview account parameters to limit information exportation from Snowflake accounts.
  • Monitor Snowflake accounts for unauthorized privilege escalation or configuration modifications and examine any of these occasions.

Moreover, it’s strongly beneficial to have all software program and working methods updated and patched to keep away from being compromised by a typical vulnerability, which could result in credentials leak.

Safety options should be deployed on each endpoint to stop infostealer an infection.

It is usually suggested to boost consciousness on pc safety and prepare workers to detect and report suspicious cybersecurity occasions.

Disclosure: I work for Development Micro, however the views expressed on this article are mine.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles