I had different plans for the weekend. Household, a motorcycle journey, perhaps lastly fixing the printer. As a substitute, I sat between espresso and VIM, writing emails to German politicians. The event was the so-called “chat management,” an EU proposal that desires to scan messages first and solely then encrypt them — the digital equal of “we’ll learn your postcard after which put it in an envelope.” From the attitude of a professor in sample recognition with a robust sense for ethics and safety, that’s not a noble compromise; it’s a design flaw of the primary order.
My identify seems on a public record of scientists who oppose mass scanning of personal communications. We didn’t assemble for enjoyable; we did it as a result of the know-how behind the thought — client-side scanning — doesn’t ship what politics likes to vow. In case you scan content material on finish units earlier than encryption, you might be putting in surveillance software program exactly the place safety ought to originate. From an engineering viewpoint, it’s like sterilizing the lab handbook with a blowtorch. The grand guarantees — detecting “identified and unknown” abuse materials, automated reporting, no false alarms, no misuse dangers — are concurrently formidable and contradictory. Detection algorithms are fallible, fashions might be…