Shortly after Hunter Lightman joined OpenAI as a researcher in 2022, he watched his colleagues launch ChatGPT, one of many fastest-growing merchandise ever. In the meantime, Lightman quietly labored on a group educating OpenAI’s fashions to unravel highschool math competitions.
At the moment that group, generally known as MathGen, is taken into account instrumental to OpenAI’s industry-leading effort to create AI reasoning fashions: the core expertise behind AI brokers that may do duties on a pc like a human would.
“We had been attempting to make the fashions higher at mathematical reasoning, which on the time they weren’t superb at,” Lightman advised TechCrunch, describing MathGen’s early work.
OpenAI’s fashions are removed from excellent right now — the corporate’s newest AI techniques nonetheless hallucinate and its brokers wrestle with complicated duties.
However its state-of-the-art fashions have improved considerably on mathematical reasoning. One among OpenAI’s fashions lately gained a gold medal on the Worldwide Math Olympiad, a math competitors for the world’s brightest highschool college students. OpenAI believes these reasoning capabilities will translate to different topics, and in the end energy general-purpose brokers that the corporate has at all times dreamed of constructing.
ChatGPT was a cheerful accident — a lowkey analysis preview turned viral client enterprise — however OpenAI’s brokers are the product of a years-long, deliberate effort throughout the firm.
“Finally, you’ll simply ask the pc for what you want and it’ll do all of those duties for you,” mentioned OpenAI CEO Sam Altman on the firm’s first developer convention in 2023. “These capabilities are sometimes talked about within the AI area as brokers. The upsides of this are going to be great.”
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco
|
October 27-29, 2025
Whether or not brokers will meet Altman’s imaginative and prescient stays to be seen, however OpenAI shocked the world with the discharge of its first AI reasoning mannequin, o1, within the fall of 2024. Lower than a yr later, the 21 foundational researchers behind that breakthrough are essentially the most extremely sought-after expertise in Silicon Valley.
Mark Zuckerberg recruited 5 of the o1 researchers to work on Meta’s new superintelligence-focused unit, providing some compensation packages north of $100 million. One among them, Shengjia Zhao, was lately named chief scientist of Meta Superintelligence Labs.
The reinforcement studying renaissance
The rise of OpenAI’s reasoning fashions and brokers are tied to a machine studying coaching approach generally known as reinforcement studying (RL). RL gives suggestions to an AI mannequin on whether or not its decisions had been appropriate or not in simulated environments.
RL has been used for many years. As an example, in 2016, a couple of yr after OpenAI was based in 2015, an AI system created by Google DeepMind utilizing RL, AlphaGo, gained world consideration after beating a world champion within the board recreation, Go.
Round that point, one among OpenAI’s first staff, Andrej Karpathy, started pondering easy methods to leverage RL to create an AI agent that might use a pc. However it could take years for OpenAI to develop the mandatory fashions and coaching methods.
By 2018, OpenAI pioneered its first massive language mannequin within the GPT collection, pretrained on huge quantities of web information and a big clusters of GPUs. GPT fashions excelled at textual content processing, ultimately resulting in ChatGPT, however struggled with fundamental math.
It took till 2023 for OpenAI to realize a breakthrough, initially dubbed “Q*” after which “Strawberry,” by combining LLMs, RL, and a way referred to as test-time computation. The latter gave the fashions additional time and computing energy to plan and work by means of issues, verifying its steps, earlier than offering a solution.
This allowed OpenAI to introduce a brand new strategy referred to as “chain-of-thought” (CoT), which improved AI’s efficiency on math questions the fashions hadn’t seen earlier than.
“I may see the mannequin beginning to cause,” mentioned El Kishky. “It could discover errors and backtrack, it could get annoyed. It actually felt like studying the ideas of an individual.”
Although individually these methods weren’t novel, OpenAI uniquely mixed them to create Strawberry, which instantly led to the event of o1. OpenAI rapidly recognized that the planning and truth checking talents of AI reasoning fashions might be helpful to energy AI brokers.
“We had solved an issue that I had been banging my head towards for a few years,” mentioned Lightman. “It was one of the vital thrilling moments of my analysis profession.”
Scaling reasoning
With AI reasoning fashions, OpenAI decided it had two new axes that will permit it to enhance AI fashions: utilizing extra computational energy in the course of the post-training of AI fashions, and giving AI fashions extra time and processing energy whereas answering a query.
“OpenAI, as an organization, thinks quite a bit about not simply the way in which issues are, however the way in which issues are going to scale,” mentioned Lightman.
Shortly after the 2023 Strawberry breakthrough, OpenAI spun up an “Brokers” group led by OpenAI researcher Daniel Selsam to make additional progress on this new paradigm, two sources advised TechCrunch. Though the group was referred to as “Brokers,” OpenAI didn’t initially differentiate between reasoning fashions and brokers as we consider them right now. The corporate simply needed to make AI techniques able to finishing complicated duties.
Finally, the work of Selsam’s Brokers group grew to become half of a bigger challenge to develop the o1 reasoning mannequin, with leaders together with OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever, chief analysis officer Mark Chen, and chief scientist Jakub Pachocki.
OpenAI must divert treasured sources — primarily expertise and GPUs — to create o1. All through OpenAI’s historical past, researchers have needed to negotiate with firm leaders to acquire sources; demonstrating breakthroughs was a surefire method to safe them.
“One of many core parts of OpenAI is that every thing in analysis is backside up,” mentioned Lightman. “Once we confirmed the proof [for o1], the corporate was like, ‘This is sensible, let’s push on it.’”
Some former staff say that the startup’s mission to develop AGI was the important thing consider reaching breakthroughs round AI reasoning fashions. By specializing in growing the smartest-possible AI fashions, quite than merchandise, OpenAI was capable of prioritize o1 above different efforts. That kind of huge funding in concepts wasn’t at all times potential at competing AI labs.
The choice to strive new coaching strategies proved prescient. By late 2024, a number of main AI labs began seeing diminishing returns on fashions created by means of conventional pretraining scaling. At the moment, a lot of the AI area’s momentum comes from advances in reasoning fashions.
What does it imply for an AI to “cause?”
In some ways, the objective of AI analysis is to recreate human intelligence with computer systems. For the reason that launch of o1, ChatGPT’s UX has been crammed with extra human-sounding options reminiscent of “pondering” and “reasoning.”
When requested whether or not OpenAI’s fashions had been really reasoning, El Kishky hedged, saying he thinks in regards to the idea by way of pc science.
“We’re educating the mannequin easy methods to effectively expend compute to get a solution. So when you outline it that manner, sure, it’s reasoning,” mentioned El Kishky.
Lightman takes the strategy of specializing in the mannequin’s outcomes and never as a lot on the means or their relation to human brains.
“If the mannequin is doing onerous issues, then it’s doing no matter vital approximation of reasoning it wants with a purpose to do this,” mentioned Lightman. “We are able to name it reasoning, as a result of it seems to be like these reasoning traces, however it’s all only a proxy for attempting to make AI instruments which are actually highly effective and helpful to lots of people.”
OpenAI’s researchers be aware individuals could disagree with their nomenclature or definitions of reasoning — and absolutely, critics have emerged — however they argue it’s much less vital than the capabilities of their fashions. Different AI researchers are likely to agree.
Nathan Lambert, an AI researcher with the non-profit AI2, compares AI reasoning modes to airplanes in a weblog put up. Each, he says, are artifical techniques impressed by nature — human reasoning and fowl flight, respectively — however they function by means of solely completely different mechanisms. That doesn’t make them any much less helpful, or any much less able to reaching comparable outcomes.
A gaggle of AI researchers from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google DeepMind agreed in a latest place paper that AI reasoning fashions should not nicely understood right now, and extra analysis is required. It could be too early to confidently declare what precisely is occurring inside them.
The following frontier: AI brokers for subjective duties
The AI brokers available on the market right now work finest for well-defined, verifiable domains reminiscent of coding. OpenAI’s Codex agent goals to assist software program engineers offload easy coding duties. In the meantime, Anthropic’s fashions have turn out to be significantly common in AI coding instruments like Cursor and Claude Code — these are a few of the first AI brokers that persons are prepared to pay up for.
Nonetheless, basic function AI brokers like OpenAI’s ChatGPT Agent and Perplexity’s Comet wrestle with most of the complicated, subjective duties individuals wish to automate. When attempting to make use of these instruments for on-line procuring or discovering a long-term parking spot, I’ve discovered the brokers take longer than I’d like and make foolish errors.
Brokers are, in fact, early techniques that may undoubtedly enhance. However researchers should first work out easy methods to higher practice the underlying fashions to finish duties which are extra subjective.
“Like many issues in machine studying, it’s a knowledge drawback,” mentioned Lightman, when requested in regards to the limitations of brokers on subjective duties. “A number of the analysis I’m actually enthusiastic about proper now is determining easy methods to practice on much less verifiable duties. We’ve some leads on easy methods to do this stuff.”
Noam Brown, an OpenAI researcher who helped create the IMO mannequin and o1, advised TechCrunch that OpenAI has new general-purpose RL methods which permit them to show AI fashions abilities that aren’t simply verified. This was how the corporate constructed the mannequin which achieved a gold medal at IMO, he mentioned.
OpenAI’s IMO mannequin was a more moderen AI system that spawns a number of brokers, which then concurrently discover a number of concepts, after which select the very best reply. Most of these AI fashions are gaining popularity; Google and xAI have lately launched state-of-the-art fashions utilizing this system.
“I believe these fashions will turn out to be extra succesful at math, and I believe they’ll get extra succesful in different reasoning areas as nicely,” mentioned Brown. “The progress has been extremely quick. I don’t see any cause to suppose it would decelerate.”
These methods could assist OpenAI’s fashions turn out to be extra performant, positive aspects that might present up within the firm’s upcoming GPT-5 mannequin. OpenAI hopes to say its dominance over opponents with the launch of GPT-5, ideally providing the finest AI mannequin to energy brokers for builders and customers.
However the firm additionally needs to make its merchandise less complicated to make use of. El Kishky says OpenAI needs to develop AI brokers that intuitively perceive what customers need, with out requiring them to pick particular settings. He says OpenAI goals to construct AI techniques that perceive when to name up sure instruments, and the way lengthy to cause for.
These concepts paint an image of an final model of ChatGPT: an agent that may do something on the web for you, and perceive the way you need it to be carried out. That’s a a lot completely different product than what ChatGPT is right now, however the firm’s analysis is squarely headed on this route.
Whereas OpenAI undoubtedly led the AI {industry} a couple of years in the past, the corporate now faces a tranche of worthy opponents. The query is not simply whether or not OpenAI can ship its agentic future, however can the corporate achieve this earlier than Google, Anthropic, xAI, or Meta beat them to it?
