Co-authored by Gavin Littleboy
Challenges in Community Compliance
Authorities businesses face important challenges in sustaining community compliance as a result of ever-increasing complexity of laws. From NIST 800-53, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, to different safety requirement guides like DISA Safety Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) for Division of Protection, complete measures require configuring and sustaining networks to make sure they keep compliant and are safe towards vulnerabilities and threats. Compounding this concern are the restricted budgets and assets accessible inside authorities entities, which might make it troublesome to allocate enough personnel and instruments to handle compliance successfully. Moreover, the necessity to combine numerous applied sciences and legacy methods additional complicates compliance efforts. These methods typically lack the flexibleness wanted to adapt rapidly to new and evolving threats, making the duty of attaining and sustaining steady compliance an ongoing battle. Companies are how automation and orchestration may help with these challenges.
Evolution of NetOps and SecOps Groups
The evolution of NetOps and SecOps groups is remodeling how authorities businesses strategy community compliance and safety.
NetOps, DevOps, SecOps confused? See particulars right here – What’s NetOps?
Historically working in silos, these groups are actually more and more required to collaborate and tackle shared challenges. NetOps groups need to deploy steady community automation and validation to simplify operations, improve pace and effectivity to ship providers, and enhance efficiency and resiliency of important community infrastructure. SecOps groups are continuously responding to evolving threats reminiscent of vulnerabilities created from configuration errors, uncared for updates, and never having satisfactory visibility into safety posture, delaying response efforts.
The Want for Automation to Scale
Automation is required to scale these efforts, enabling groups to effectively handle routine duties and reply swiftly to threats as community calls for develop. Many technical challenges exist in automating community compliance. For instance, what are we on the lookout for on the subject of community compliance? For networks, we’re validating end-of-life gear, code variations, CVE/PSIRTs (Frequent Vulnerabilities and Exposures/Product Safety Incident Response Groups), Safety Implementation guides reminiscent of DoD STIG, and community and organizational requirements. As this record of compliance issues demonstrates, there are numerous touchpoints that rapidly make compliance a difficult process and turns into a “firefight” situation the place all assets are urgently centered to make amends for compliance earlier than the subsequent audit. Because it pertains to community configurations, there are three patterns in compliance checks.
Patterns Round Community Compliance
A given compliance requirement necessitates the evaluation of both a community configuration or community state. These checks typically fall into 3 evaluation patterns: match configuration, match variables, or match enterprise logic.
Configuration matches search for actual matches in configuration. Examples embrace disabling or enabling of providers reminiscent of http or password-encryption. Variable matches search for partial or variable substitution matches in configuration. Examples embrace validating that a number of NTP (Community Time Protocol) servers are configured or that configured BGP (Border Gateway Protocol) neighbors are utilizing authentication. Enterprise logic matches search for organizationally outlined patterns in configuration. Examples embrace validating {that a} boundary entry management record is utilized to the proper interface and that it blocks organizational outlined protocols. This final sample is essentially the most advanced to implement and varies extensively between organizations based mostly on the native implementation of the required coverage.
As we speak, SecOps groups use their area particular auditing instruments to audit the community and create studies. These studies are then shared with the NetOps group who should interpret, translate to community area configurations, after which implement the community change. This prolonged course of then repeats.
Automation Allows Steady Compliance
Think about a community automation platform the place NetOps and SecOps can leverage unified tooling to resolve widespread targets and allow steady compliance auditing, reporting, and remediation. Safety groups sometimes describe compliance “intent” within the type of guidelines that validate whether or not a community configuration satisfies the factors. Community operators should fulfill not solely these compliance necessities, however community design necessities and different components when making a ultimate template to be utilized to the community.
Cisco Crosswork Community Companies Orchestrator (NSO) gives this functionality by enabling community operators to automate and handle advanced networks with ease with a built-in compliance engine to validate community compliance. It presents a flexible and highly effective resolution that helps configuration administration, service orchestration, and network-wide coverage enforcement. Cisco NSO 6.x comes with important compliance updates reminiscent of compliance templates, an intuitive compliance reporting interface, and continues to introduce options to cowl the patterns above. Cisco NSO has fashionable APIs and a stateful database the place steady compliance might be validated based mostly on real-time community state and reported as much as northbound methods. Cisco NSO can also be model-driven, that means knowledge fashions and their intents can instantly be translated to meant implementation state within the community. This permits a brand new paradigm for SecOps groups to have the ability to audit and report compliance checks with the identical tooling and configuration templates that the NetOps group have outlined for the community for remediation. With Cisco NSO, groups can guarantee constant compliance throughout multi-vendor community parts, streamline operations, and improve collaboration between totally different groups inside a corporation.
To study extra about Cisco Crosswork NSO or to see examples of find out how to construct compliance templates, see beneath.
Crosswork NSO Resolution Overview
Compliance Reporting Examples Repository on NSO Developer GitHub
Closing Ideas
Because the roles inside NetOps and SecOps evolve, fostering a tradition of studying and flexibility ensures that personnel can successfully handle new applied sciences and regulatory necessities. By constructing cross-functional experience and problem-solving capabilities, businesses can tackle present compliance wants and anticipate future calls for, resulting in extra resilient and responsive operations. Reaching efficient compliance options and leveraging automation yields substantial returns on funding (ROI) for presidency businesses, leading to notable value financial savings and enabling businesses to allocate assets extra strategically and give attention to their core missions. This not solely protects the company’s status but additionally ensures the uninterrupted supply of important providers.
To dive deeper into community compliance and automation, be a part of us at Cisco Reside San Diego from June 8-12, 2025 for 2 insightful periods exploring methods and options to reinforce your community operations:
DEVNET-2144 – “Automating Community Compliance: Leveraging Cisco NSO for Compliance Auditing, Reporting, and Remediation”
DEVWKS-2083 – “The Journey of Automating Community Compliance utilizing Cisco NSO”
If you want to study extra about how Cisco may help your compliance wants or to get began in your Automation Journey, attain out to your Account Staff.
Further Related Hyperlinks
Be taught extra about different Cisco options to assist authorities businesses with compliance
Cisco SaaS Compliant Product Availability
Share:
