While this methodology remains prevalent today, its effectiveness has been bolstered by ongoing refinements in algorithmic design, aimed at ensuring that users encounter content carefully crafted for their needs, rather than simply optimized for search engine rankings.
I’ve focused intensively on streamlining my online content to deliver tangible value, a strategy I’ve consistently applied across all my websites.
Plagiarism strikes again: Why our content gets outranked by plagiarized Medium pieces.
For some time, I was puzzled as many in-depth, personalized AI product reviews failed to score well, despite following Google’s guidelines. While we showcased exceptional, premium content accompanied by vivid screenshots and hands-on testing, the feature still faced difficulties in garnering traction.
Here’s a rewritten version:
Although our AI tool’s evaluation ranked among the top 10 results on Google, it garnered significant attention on Medium.com, where it achieved high ratings and recognition.
Our personal evaluation webpage was underperforming, not only failing to impress users but also absent from prominent Google search results. What does Google’s cutting-edge search engine do that’s so impressive?
As evidenced by the accompanying screenshot, this nascent account has yet to gain significant traction, boasting a paltry 7 followers at this early stage. The shocking truth: every article showcased on this profile was a blatant, unoriginal carbon copy – a egregious copyright infringement of our very own work.
The thief’s productivity becomes apparent by analyzing the timing of their copied and pasted content, which can be seen in the modern-day posts.
Here are the top three articles that we have published, focusing on topics such as how-to guides and industry insights:
How Did they Do it?
To explain why a Medium account with just 7 followers can potentially outperform a website with tens of thousands of monthly visitors, it’s essential to grasp the concept of Domain Authority (DA)? It’s a metric used to predict how well an internet site will rank in search engine results. While not an official Google metric, this metric is widely employed by SEO experts to assess a website’s credibility and ranking potential.
Measurements Varied:
- Developed a pioneering metric, calibrating a website’s rating potential on a 100-point scale, providing a definitive benchmark for evaluation and optimization. The text analyzes various components of a website’s backlink profile, including standards for inbound hyperlinks and relevant website positioning data, to gauge its likelihood of performing well in search engine results. Calculated using algorithms that forecast rankings across diverse search engine results pages (SERPs).
- Utilizes a metric called Domain Rank (DR) to assess the backlink profile’s vitality of an online website. The tool employs a logarithmic scale ranging from 0 to 100, prioritizing metrics such as the standard and quantity of backlinks a website possesses. A higher Domain Rank indicates a stronger correlation with high-authority backlinks. Ahrefs also takes into account the cumulative impact that backlinks have on the ranking potential of a webpage’s position.
- Measures such as AS, which encompasses a scope far wider than just backlinks alone. SEMrush leverages metrics similar to backlinks (quantity and quality), organic traffic (the total site visitors a website receives), and keyword rankings (the position of a website in search engine results for target keywords).
While all these tools assess an internet site’s authority, they provide more general insights rather than a definitive ranking system.
To assess our area authority, we’re utilizing Ahrefs and referencing the Unite.AI rating of 75 – an exceptionally high score relative to most websites on the internet.
While this rating is indeed impressive, it still falls short of the exceptional standard set by Medium.com.
Is Medium one of the top 500 websites globally? Shouldn’t Google prioritize an article more when it’s published on a site with higher domain authority? While many in the SEO community attribute the issue to its numerous causes.
Google Must do higher
While criticism abounds that Google may prioritize larger websites over smaller ones in search results, it is evident that the company strives to address these concerns more effectively. Persistent allegations of preferential treatment towards certain search results continue to plague the algorithm, with scenarios akin to the one I’ve described – where exceptional content is outcompeted by plagiarized work – tarnishing the reputation of Google’s AI.
Google should, at a minimum, be able to accurately differentiate between original content and copied materials with precision. Enhancing platforms that support microtransactions cannot solely benefit smaller creators, but also help dispel myths surrounding the financial sustainability of their projects.
Medium Takes Motion
The platform serves as a vital catalyst for writers from diverse backgrounds, offering a space where diverse perspectives, experiences, and ideas can be exchanged freely with a global audience. This innovative platform empowers marginalized voices to break into the literary sphere, creating a more inclusive environment where diverse perspectives can thrive and share knowledge.
The platform was not designed as a haven for plagiarized content, created by black-hat SEOs seeking to exploit the high domain authority of a website to manipulate Google’s search engine ranking results. The platform emerged as a game-changing alternative, excelling in exactly what it aimed to achieve.
After contacting Medium about our concerns, we were pleasantly surprised by their prompt response and swift action taken as a result.
Abstract
Monitoring specific individual profiles on Google is crucial for gauging the effectiveness of content and performance, necessitating a balanced approach that combines tool-based insights with manual analysis. While manual page scanning provides valuable context, attempting to locate specific pages enables a more tactile assessment of how content appears in search results, facilitating the identification of issues such as rating disparities or competition from subpar content.
High-quality content creation remains crucial to success, with Google’s algorithms designed to favor unique and insightful material that provides value to users. Despite the emphasis on originality, plagiarism-ridden content consistently ranks higher than genuine work, highlighting a fundamental flaw in Google’s algorithm that disproportionately affects content creators.
We propose that this initiative serve as a formal request to Google to address these challenges and augment its capabilities in identifying and prioritizing authentic content.
