Regardless that Fitbit initiated a firmware replace to mitigate the potential for battery overheating in early 2020, the corporate continued to obtain stories of customers struggling burns as a result of wearable gadget overheating.
As a result of Fitbit didn’t instantly report back to the CPSC as required, regardless that it possessed data that fairly supported the conclusion that the smartwatches contained a defect that would create a considerable product hazard or created an unreasonable danger of great harm, it was fined by the Fee.It’s additionally price mentioning that the CPSC and Fitbit introduced a recall of the Ionic smartwatches again in March 2022, which said that the corporate had acquired not less than 115 stories in the USA of the battery within the smartwatch overheating, with 78 stories of burn accidents within the US together with two stories of third-degree burns and 4 stories of second-degree burns.
The Fee introduced that other than the $12.25 million civil penalty, the settlement settlement requires Fitbit to “keep inside controls and procedures designed to make sure compliance with the Client Product Security Act (CPSA), together with enhancements made to its compliance program.”
As well as, Fitbit will now need to submit an annual report relating to its compliance program, inside controls, and inside audit of the effectiveness of compliance insurance policies, procedures, techniques and coaching.
