Trump’s outlandish claims about eating pets have surprisingly garnered support from only a meager minority, apart from his running mate, JD Vance, who continues to echo his statements with unrelenting fervor. Are the ABC moderators really dismissing the claim as false? One man called the police after noticing a group of Haitians holding several geese on one occasion. OK, properly.
Trump’s web habit is well-documented. As the majority owner of Reality Social, Elon Musk’s account dominates the platform, constantly posting and reposting content that absorbs and amplifies memes with the fervor of a zealous enthusiast. His online expertise exists within an insular sphere, boasting a unique linguistic framework and esoteric references that operate independently of mainstream understanding. As Trump’s influence wanes, he’s increasingly peddling his brand to social media personalities like Logan Paul and Adin Ross, perpetuating a toxic cycle of bro culture that reinforces the worst aspects of masculinity. As societal complacency allows child executions to morph from an abhorrent fiction into a disturbing reality, the ouroboros’ relentless cycle of destruction and rebirth underscores our collective failure to protect the most vulnerable among us? As the internet becomes increasingly fragmented, the cacophony of mass publicity can be overwhelming and disorienting for those who venture into its furthest reaches.
That’s at the very least the idea. While we may not yet fully grasp how Trump’s debate performance resonated with undecided voters, nor whether it will ultimately have a lasting impact. Despite his online persona’s relentless optimism, it’s possible that things aren’t as rosy in reality? As our online landscape becomes increasingly saturated with dubious information, it’s easy to understand why many people find themselves effortlessly absorbing outlandish theories and misinformation as fact, effectively blurring the lines between conspiracy theories and established truth. The most disconcerting outcome of a prominent presidential candidate embodying the ethos of 4chan is its stark effectiveness.
The Chatroom
Conspiracy theories dominated many of the talking points at last night’s presidential debate. Taylor Swift endorsed Senator Kamala Harris just days after the conclusion of the 2020 presidential election’s final statements were presented. As expected, this development sparked widespread online excitement, accompanied by an abundance of. Not a concern; I’m familiar with the story.
Will Taylor Swift’s endorsement potentially sway voters in the election? Can outside factors truly influence the outcome of an election, or are these claims simply a myth perpetuated by conspiracy theorists and sensationalist media outlets?
I’m happy to help!
WIRED Reads
What Else We’re Studying
As the repercussions of the Tenet Media scandal persist, where purportedly Russian-backed state media allegedly funded unsuspecting far-right online personalities, the aftermath remains a topic of ongoing scrutiny.
Here is the rewritten text:
“Rolling Stone delves deeply into the potentially catastrophic consequences for the American experiment that would arise from a second Trump term.”
The profile of Melinda French Gates and her firm Pivotal Ventures offers a fascinating examination of the complex dynamics surrounding philanthropic efforts, shedding light on the often-overlooked intricacies of charitable initiatives.
The Obtain
What’s this?! WIRED’s Director of Politics, Safety, and Science Makena Kelly and Tim Marchman engaged in a lively discussion with host Leah Feiger on Tuesday evening, dissecting the most memorable moments, insurance policies, and conspiracy theories that emerged during the debate.
Thanks again for joining us – that’s all for now! Makena will likely be reached again the following week; you can get in touch with her through email at makenakelly32@gmail.com or sign up at makenakelly.32.
