As knowledge advancements enable robots to collaborate with humans, evidence suggests that individuals are increasingly viewing them as teammates – a development that can yield both positive and negative impacts on human performance. In many cases, team members tend to relax and rely on others to handle tasks. A classic phenomenon in social psychology: when individuals exhibit reduced effort in group settings because they feel their individual contributions will not be recognized or appreciated, often due to the presence of higher-achieving peers. Researchers at the Technical University of Berlin explored whether individuals exhibit social loafing tendencies when collaborating with robots.
“Innovative synergy,” declared Dietlind Helene Cymek, pioneer behind groundbreaking research on the collaborative benefits of teamwork.
A serving to hand
Scientists tested their theories by simulating an industrial defect-inspection exercise, examining circuit boards for faults. Scientists provided images of circuit boards to all 42 participants. The circuit boards appear fuzzy, and enhanced images are only accessible through hovering your cursor over them. The data enabled researchers to track individuals’ examination of the board.
Contributors have been notified that half of them are working with circuit boards that have undergone inspection by Panda, a cutting-edge robotic technology. While these contributors had not worked directly with Panda, they were still familiar with the robotic system, having encountered it while they worked. Following a thorough review of the boards, contributors have been asked to evaluate their own performance, considering the sense of responsibility they felt for the task and the methods employed.
Wanting however not seeing
Initially, it appeared that the introduction of Panda had yielded no significant disparity – a statistical analysis revealed no notable difference in the time allocated for examining circuit boards or searching the web by both teams. Team members evaluated their feelings of responsibility towards tasks, effort invested, and productivity with equal emphasis.
As researchers scrutinized contributors’ mistake rates more closely, they discovered that those working with Panda were actually detecting fewer flaws towards the end of the process, having already identified numerous errors thanks to Panda’s effective flagging capabilities. The notion of a ‘trying but not seeing’ effect may arise when people become accustomed to relying on something and subsequently interact with it less mentally. Despite the contributors’ belief that they had devoted equal attention, a subconscious assumption existed that Panda would not have overlooked any flaws.
According to Dr. Linda Onnasch, senior author of the study, it’s easy to track where someone is going, but much more challenging to determine whether that visible data is being adequately processed on a psychological level.
The experimental setup for the human-robot collaborative team requires a carefully designed framework to facilitate seamless interactions between humans and robots. .
Security in danger?
The warning issued by the authors emphasized potential security implications. According to Onnasch, our experiment revealed that teams worked diligently for approximately 90 minutes before discovering a significant reduction in high-quality errors when collaborating in groups. “When workshifts stretch out, and tasks become repetitive, without clear performance metrics or feedback, employee motivation often falters significantly.” Manufacturing processes often rely on double-checking, especially in critical safety areas, which can inadvertently have an adverse impact on overall work performance.
While the researchers initially made significant headway, they soon discovered that their methodology was not without its flaws. Although contributors had successfully collaborated with robots and demonstrated their effectiveness, they initially struggled to integrate seamlessly with Panda. Despite the challenges, researchers have struggled to replicate social loafing in a controlled laboratory setting due to the fact that participants are aware of being observed.
The primary limitation of our study lies in its laboratory setting, according to Cymek’s definition. “To grasp the scope of the motivational challenge in human-robot collaboration, it’s essential to venture into real-world settings, challenging prevailing assumptions alongside seasoned professionals who regularly work alongside robots in team-based environments.”
Frontiers Journals & Weblog
