With compact smartphones becoming a rarity, the options in the premium segment dwindle significantly when scrutinized closely. Nonetheless, Apple and Samsung possess the distinct technologies that align with these fundamental factors. While some might contend that these phones don’t fully test the boundaries of a flagship device, they’re close enough.
Two contenders stand out as more affordable options compared to their higher-end counterparts, making them an attractive choice for budget-conscious consumers. In a technology-driven world where innovation is key, the age-old debate of Samsung vs. Despite Apple’s stronghold on some markets, the vanilla iPhone 16 faces a sticky issue in certain regions: it starts at €250 more than its European competitor, a gap that widens to a significant disparity in the US market.
Desk of Contents:
To initiate a thorough assessment of your content by our experienced editors. within the following textual content.
Dimension comparability
Despite being manufactured by distinct companies, the iPhone 16 and Galaxy S24 share numerous striking parallels.
Two handsets share similarities in terms of physical dimensions, with the Samsung Galaxy S24 boasting a slight advantage due to its narrower, shorter, and thinner design, while also featuring a larger display with more screen real estate. You may be gaining excess weight within the same physical space.
The vanilla iPhone models, including the iPhone 16, and Samsung’s flagship Galaxy S series, specifically the Galaxy S24, showcase a striking similarity in their design aesthetic. The flat facet frames, back, and front panels feature protruding digicam lenses. Essentially indistinguishable in terms of quality. The devices utilize Corning-made glass panels on both the back and front surfaces, seamlessly integrated with a durable aluminum frame. While both bodies are IP68-rated, Apple’s guarantee offers enhanced protection against water penetration, extending the maximum depth to 1 meter compared to Samsung’s standard IP68 rating. 6m).
Show comparability
The iPhone 16 and Galaxy S24 boast exceptional display quality, making no concessions in this regard. Each panel assists in meeting the same HDR requirements and can display quite vivid colors. According to our evaluations, the iPhone holds a minor advantage with an additional 300 nits of brightness.
Despite some drawbacks, the S24’s standout feature is its impressive 120Hz LTPO OLED display. The iPhone 16’s display seems to settle for a less-than-ideal 60Hz refresh rate in 2024.
Battery life
The iPhone 16 stands out as a clear leader when it comes to battery life, hands down. While the Galaxy S24 excels in its initial performance, it truly shines online where it outlasts its competitor by almost doubling the runtime on a single charge. The iPhone 12 exhibits significantly superior video playback and benchmark scores.
When battery life is a top priority, the iPhone 16 stands out as the top choice.
Charging velocity
Both the iPhone 16 and Galaxy S24 offer similarly rapid charging capabilities for the most part. Shouldn’t we be saying they’re equally lethargic instead?
Despite the overall time spent costing the device, the S24 actually outperforms the iPhone 16 by approximately 20 minutes. We’d say that’s more sensible sooner.
Notwithstanding, the charging curve within the initial 15 minutes to a half-hour is almost identical, as the two devices provide approximately 60% of the charge back within that timeframe.
Speaker take a look at
While both the iPhone 16 and Galaxy S24 deliver equally robust stereo audio performance, the iPhone 16 holds a slight edge in terms of sound quality. Apple’s iPhone boasts a richer sonic experience with more profound low-end notes, courtesy of its enhanced bass response. The vocals aren’t muffled both.
The Galaxy’s audio system lacks depth in the lower frequencies, resulting in a noticeably flat sound profile.
Efficiency
The iPhone 16 is powered by Apple’s A18 chip, whereas the Galaxy S24 is expected to be fueled by Samsung’s Exynos 2400 processor. Apple’s latest processor is set to revolutionize its consumer-focused offerings this year, delivering a substantial boost in performance, efficiency, and artificial intelligence capabilities. While traditionally Apple’s silicon offers superior efficiency compared to its Android rivals, Samsung’s 10-core Exynos 2400 processor proves to be a formidable competitor in terms of performance. The system leverages a custom-designed GPU, a collaborative effort with AMD to optimize performance and efficiency.
Handset manufacturers consistently fall short in terms of base storage capacity. The S24 and iPhone 16 start with configurations ranging from 8GB of RAM paired with 128GB of storage, ultimately scaling up to 8GB of RAM combined with 512GB of storage.
While the iPhone 16 boasts NVMe storage, Samsung’s S24 compromises with UFS 3.1 for its 128GB base model, upgrading to UFS 4.0 for all other variants. In every situation, the Samsung Galaxy S24 lags behind the Apple iPhone 16 in terms of performance. Storage velocity does not seem to hold much importance in itself?
Benchmark efficiency
It’s widely expected that the next-generation iPhone, dubbed iPhone 16, will set a new standard for mobile devices in terms of performance and capabilities. That’s likely accurate for approximately half the instances. The new device outperforms the Galaxy S24 by 17% in Geekbench 6’s multi-core test, which is a CPU-intensive benchmark. However, it lags behind the S24 by 5% in GPU-heavy workloads like 3DMark Wild Life Extreme. A subtle yet significant difference.
Digital camera comparability
The iPhone 16 and Samsung Galaxy S24 share equally impressive primary cameras, both featuring 48-megapixel sensors. The main difference between them lies in their telephoto and ultrawide camera setups.
The Samsung Galaxy S24 features a 3x telephoto camera, granting it a subtle advantage in optical zoom range compared to the Apple iPhone 16, which does not have a dedicated telephoto lens.
While each device’s ultra-wide camera offers high-resolution performance, the iPhone’s ultra-wide lens stands out for its added autofocus feature, absent in the Galaxy S24’s model, enabling it to excel at capturing close-up shots with greater ease and precision.
The smartphones’ selfie digicams boast impressive capabilities, featuring 12MP sensors and equivalent focal lengths that make them competitive in capturing high-quality front-facing photos and delivering smooth video conferencing experiences.
Picture high quality
In all honesty, there aren’t many competitors in this space? The iPhone 16 excels in capturing exceptional still images under both daylight and low-light conditions, thanks to its advanced dual-camera setup featuring a primary camera and an ultra-wide-angle lens. The nighttime footage boasts a significantly enhanced visual quality, featuring crisp, high-definition images with noticeably reduced grain or noise.
Given the substantial advancements in camera technology, it’s plausible to assume that the 3x crop zoom on the iPhone surpasses the quality of the 3x telephoto images from the S24.
One of the standout features of the Galaxy S24 is its powerful processing capabilities. Samsung’s telephones are renowned for displaying more vibrant colors, thanks to the latest, more precise processing technology featured in the S24 series. The iPhone photographs are flatter.
Video high quality
The same applies to films. The iPhone 16’s camera capabilities have seen a significant boost, with noticeable improvements in image quality and overall performance. These images are now sharper, more refined, and capable of capturing even subtle details that were previously obscured by extraneous elements.
Below are a few frame grabs from the movies taken with each phone at various focal lengths, making it easier to compare them side by side.
Verdict
For the most part, the iPhone 14 is generally considered the better device. The device’s battery life is extended when used away from the charger, featuring a brighter display albeit without high-refresh-rate support. The audio system delivers superior sound quality, while its processor provides enhanced performance capabilities. Moreover, the camera experience offers improved overall functionality.
The Samsung Galaxy S24 boasts a noticeably smoother display, charges slightly faster, features a powerful 3x optical zoom camera, and offers a more affordable price point, making it an attractive upgrade option. While your Android preference might sway your decision, if you’re an open-minded consumer with the financial means, the iPhone 16 stands out as the premier choice for those uncommitted to a particular ecosystem.
- The brighter show.
- The nicer audio system.
- The extra highly effective CPU.
- The commonly higher digicam expertise.
- The iOS ecosystem.
Experience the future of smartphones with the Apple iPhone 16:
- The smoother show.
- The marginally sooner charging.
- The cheaper price tag.
- The Android ecosystem.
