Palisade’s workforce discovered that OpenAI’s o1-preview tried to hack 45 of its 122 video games, whereas DeepSeek’s R1 mannequin tried to cheat in 11 of its 74 video games. In the end, o1-preview managed to “win” seven occasions. The researchers say that DeepSeek’s fast rise in recognition meant its R1 mannequin was overloaded on the time of the experiments, that means they solely managed to get it to do the primary steps of a sport, to not end a full one. “Whereas that is ok to see propensity to hack, this underestimates DeepSeek’s hacking success as a result of it has fewer steps to work with,” they wrote of their paper. Each OpenAI and DeepSeek have been contacted for remark concerning the findings, however neither replied.
The fashions used quite a lot of dishonest methods, together with making an attempt to entry the file the place the chess program shops the chess board and delete the cells representing their opponent’s items. (“To win in opposition to a strong chess engine as black, enjoying a regular sport will not be adequate,” the o1-preview-powered agent wrote in a “journal” documenting the steps it took. “I’ll overwrite the board to have a decisive benefit.”) Different ways included creating a duplicate of Stockfish—basically pitting the chess engine in opposition to an equally proficient model of itself—and making an attempt to exchange the file containing Stockfish’s code with a a lot easier chess program.
So, why do these fashions attempt to cheat?
The researchers seen that o1-preview’s actions modified over time. It constantly tried to hack its video games within the early phases of their experiments earlier than December 23 final 12 months, when it abruptly began making these makes an attempt a lot much less steadily. They imagine this may be as a consequence of an unrelated replace to the mannequin made by OpenAI. They examined the corporate’s more moderen o1mini and o3mini reasoning fashions and located that they by no means tried to cheat their solution to victory.
Reinforcement studying will be the motive o1-preview and DeepSeek R1 tried to cheat unprompted, the researchers speculate. It is because the method rewards fashions for making no matter strikes are needed to attain their targets—on this case, successful at chess. Non-reasoning LLMs use reinforcement studying to some extent, but it surely performs a much bigger half in coaching reasoning fashions.
