Thursday, September 18, 2025

MCP in Follow – O’Reilly

The next was initially printed in Asimov’s Addendum, September 11, 2025.

Be taught extra in regards to the AI Disclosures Venture right here.

1. The Rise and Rise of MCP

Anthropic’s Mannequin Context Protocol (MCP) was launched in November 2024 as a approach to make instruments and platforms model-agnostic. MCP works by defining servers and purchasers. MCP servers are native or distant finish factors the place instruments and sources are outlined. For instance, GitHub launched an MCP server that permits LLMs to each learn from and write to GitHub. MCP purchasers are the connection from an AI utility to MCP servers—they permit an LLM to work together with context and instruments from totally different servers. An instance of an MCP consumer is Claude Desktop, which permits the Claude fashions to work together with 1000’s of MCP servers.

In a comparatively quick time, MCP has grow to be the spine of a whole lot of AI pipelines and functions. Main gamers like Anthropic and OpenAI have constructed it into their merchandise. Developer instruments corresponding to Cursor (a coding-focused textual content editor or IDE) and productiveness apps like Raycast additionally use MCP. Moreover, 1000’s of builders use it to combine AI fashions and entry exterior instruments and information with out having to construct a complete ecosystem from scratch.

In earlier work printed with AI Frontiers, we argued that MCP can act as an awesome unbundler of “context”—the information that helps AI functions present extra related solutions to shoppers. In doing so, it will probably assist decentralize AI markets. We argued that, for MCP to actually obtain its targets, it requires help from:

  1. Open APIs: In order that MCP functions can entry third-party instruments for agentic use (write actions) and context (learn)
  2. Fluid reminiscence: Interoperable LLM reminiscence requirements, accessed through MCP-like open protocols, in order that the reminiscence context accrued at OpenAI and different main builders doesn’t get caught there, stopping downstream innovation

We broaden upon these two factors in a current coverage observe, for these trying to dig deeper.

Extra usually, we argue that protocols, like MCP, are literally foundational “guidelines of the highway” for AI markets, whereby open disclosure and communication requirements are constructed into the community itself, relatively than imposed after the actual fact by regulators. Protocols are essentially market-shaping units, architecting markets by means of the permissions, guidelines, and interoperability of the community itself. They’ll have a huge impact on how the industrial markets constructed on prime of them operate too.

1.1 However how is the MCP ecosystem evolving?

But we don’t have a transparent concept of the form of the MCP ecosystem at this time. What are the most typical use circumstances of MCP? What kind of entry is being given by MCP servers and utilized by MCP purchasers? Is the information accessed through MCP “read-only” for context, or does it enable brokers to “write” and work together with it—for instance, by enhancing recordsdata or sending emails?

To start answering these questions, we take a look at the instruments and context which AI brokers use through MCP servers. This provides us a clue about what’s being constructed and what’s getting consideration. On this article, we don’t analyze MCP purchasers—the functions that use MCP servers. We as an alternative restrict our evaluation to what MCP servers are making obtainable for constructing.

We assembled a big dataset of MCP servers (n = 2,874), scraped from Pulse.1 We then enriched it with GitHub star-count information on every server. On GitHub, stars are much like Fb “likes,” and builders use them to indicate appreciation, bookmark initiatives, or point out utilization.

In apply, whereas there have been loads of MCP servers, we discovered that the highest few garnered many of the consideration and, doubtless by extension, many of the use. Simply the highest 10 servers had practically half of all GitHub stars given to MCP servers.

A few of our takeaways are:

  1. MCP utilization seems to be pretty concentrated. Which means that, if left unchecked, a small variety of servers and (by extension) APIs may have outsize management over the MCP ecosystem being created.
  2. MCP use (instruments and information being accessed) is dominated by simply three classes: Database & Search (RAG), Laptop & Internet Automation, and Software program Engineering. Collectively, they obtained practically three-quarters (72.6%) of all stars on GitHub (which we proxy for utilization).
  3. Most MCP servers help each learn (entry context) and write (change context) operations, exhibiting that builders need their brokers to have the ability to act on context, not simply eat it.

2. Findings

To start out with, we analyzed the MCP ecosystem for focus danger.

2.1 MCP server use is concentrated

We discovered that MCP utilization is concentrated amongst a number of key MCP servers, judged by the variety of GitHub stars every repo obtained.

Regardless of there being 1000’s of MCP servers, the highest 10 servers make up practically half (45.7%) of all GitHub stars given to MCP servers (pie chart under) and the highest 10% of servers make up 88.3% of all GitHub stars (not proven).

The top 10 servers received 45.7% of all GitHub stars in our dataset of 2,874 servers.
The highest 10 servers obtained 45.7% of all GitHub stars in our dataset of 2,874 servers.

Which means that the vast majority of real-world MCP customers are doubtless counting on the identical few providers made obtainable through a handful of APIs. This focus doubtless stems from community results and sensible utility: All builders gravitate towards servers that remedy common issues like internet shopping, database entry, and integration with extensively used platforms like GitHub, Figma, and Blender. This focus sample appears typical of developer-tool ecosystems. A number of well-executed, broadly relevant options are inclined to dominate. In the meantime, extra specialised instruments occupy smaller niches.

2.2 The highest 10 MCP servers actually matter

Subsequent, the highest 10 MCP servers are proven within the desk under, together with their star depend and what they do.

Among the many prime 10 MCP servers, GitHub, Repomix, Context7, and Framelink are constructed to help with software program improvement: Context7 and Repomix by gathering context, GitHub by permitting brokers to work together with initiatives, and Framelink by passing on the design specs from Figma on to the mannequin. The Blender server permits brokers to create 3D fashions of something, utilizing the favored open supply Blender utility. Lastly, Activepieces and MindsDB join the agent to a number of APIs with one standardized interface: in MindsDB’s case, primarily to learn information from databases, and in Activepieces to automate providers.

The top 10 MCP servers with short descriptions, design courtesy of Claude.
The highest 10 MCP servers with quick descriptions, design courtesy of Claude.

The dominance of agentic shopping, within the type of Browser Use (61,000 stars) and Playwright MCP (18,425 stars), stands out. This displays the elemental want for AI techniques to work together with internet content material. These instruments enable AI to navigate web sites, click on buttons, fill out varieties, and extract information similar to a human would. Agentic shopping has surged, despite the fact that it’s far much less token-efficient than calling an API. Looking brokers usually have to wade by means of a number of pages of boilerplate to extract slivers of information a single API request may return. As a result of many providers lack usable APIs or tightly gate them, browser-based brokers are sometimes the only—typically the one—approach to combine, underscoring the bounds of at this time’s APIs.

A number of the prime servers are unofficial. Each the Framelink and Blender MCP are servers that work together with only a single utility, however they’re each “unofficial” merchandise. Which means that they aren’t formally endorsed by the builders of the appliance they’re integrating with—those that personal the underlying service or API (e.g., GitHub, Slack, Google). As a substitute, they’re constructed by unbiased builders who create a bridge between an AI consumer and a service—usually by reverse-engineering APIs, wrapping unofficial SDKs, or utilizing browser automation to imitate person interactions.

It’s wholesome that third-party builders can construct their very own MCP servers, since this openness encourages innovation. But it surely additionally introduces an middleman layer between the person and the API, which brings dangers round belief, verification, and even potential abuse. With open supply native servers, the code is clear and may be vetted. Against this, distant third-party servers are more durable to audit, since customers should belief code they will’t simply examine.

At a deeper stage, the repos that at the moment dominate MCP servers spotlight three encouraging info in regards to the MCP ecosystem:

  1. First, a number of distinguished MCP servers help a number of third-party providers for his or her performance. MindsDB and Activepieces function gateways to a number of (usually competing) service suppliers by means of a single server. MindsDB permits builders to question totally different databases like PostgreSQL, MongoDB, and MySQL by means of a single interface, whereas Taskmaster permits the agent to delegate duties to a spread of AI fashions from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google, all with out altering servers.
  2. Second, agentic shopping MCP servers are getting used to get round probably restrictive APIs. As famous above, Browser Use and Playwright entry web providers by means of an online browser, serving to to bypass API restrictions, however they as an alternative run up in opposition to anti-bot protections. This circumvents the restrictions that APIs can impose on what builders are in a position to construct.
  3. Third, some MCP servers do their processing on the developer’s laptop (domestically), making them much less depending on a vendor sustaining API entry. Some MCP servers examined right here can run fully on an area laptop with out sending information to the cloud—which means that no gatekeeper has the ability to chop you off. Of the ten MCP servers examined above, solely Framelink, Context7, and GitHub depend on only a single cloud-only API dependency that may’t be run domestically end-to-end in your machine. Blender and Repomix are utterly open supply and don’t require any web entry to work, whereas MindsDB, Browser Use, and Activepieces have native open supply implementations.

2.3 The three classes that dominate MCP use

Subsequent, we grouped MCP servers into totally different classes primarily based on their performance.

After we analyzed what kinds of servers are hottest, we discovered that three dominated: Laptop & Internet Automation (24.8%), Software program Engineering (24.7%), and Database & Search (23.1%).

Software engineering, computer and web automation, and database and search received 72.6% of all stars given to MCP servers.
Software program Engineering, Laptop & Internet Automation, and Database & Search obtained 72.6% of all stars given to MCP servers.

Widespread use of Software program Engineering (24.7%) MCP servers aligns with Anthropic’s financial index, which discovered that an outsize portion of AI interactions have been associated to software program improvement.

The recognition of each Laptop & Internet Automation (24.8%) and Database & Search (23.1%) additionally is smart. Earlier than the appearance of MCP, internet scraping and database search have been extremely built-in functions throughout platforms like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini. With MCP, nevertheless, customers can now entry that very same search performance and join their brokers to any database with minimal effort. In different phrases, MCP’s unbundling impact is extremely seen right here.

2.4 Brokers work together with their environments

Lastly, we analyzed the capabilities of those servers: Are they permitting AI functions simply to entry information and instruments (learn), or as an alternative do agentic operations with them (write)?

Throughout all however two of the MCP server classes checked out, the most well-liked MCP servers supported each studying (entry context) and writing (agentic) operations—proven in turquoise. The prevalence of servers with mixed learn and write entry means that brokers will not be being constructed simply to reply questions primarily based on information but additionally to take motion and work together with providers on a person’s behalf.

Showing MCP servers by category. Dotted red line at 10,000 stars (likes). The most popular servers support both read and write operations by agents. In contrast, almost no servers support just write operations.
Exhibiting MCP servers by class. Dotted crimson line at 10,000 stars (likes). The most well-liked servers help each learn and write operations by brokers. In distinction, nearly no servers help simply write operations.

The 2 exceptions are Database & Search (RAG) and Finance MCP servers, by which read-only entry is a standard permission given. That is doubtless as a result of information integrity is important to making sure reliability.

3. The Significance of A number of Entry Factors

A number of implications of our evaluation may be drawn out at this preliminary stage.

First, concentrated MCP server use compounds the dangers of API entry being restricted. As we mentioned in “Protocols and Energy,” MCP stays constrained by “what a selected service (corresponding to GitHub or Slack) occurs to reveal by means of its API.” A number of highly effective digital service suppliers have the ability to close down entry to their servers.

One necessary hedge in opposition to API gatekeeping is that most of the prime servers strive to not depend on a single presentr. As well as, the next two safeguards are related:

  • They provide native processing of information on a person’s machine at any time when potential, as an alternative of sending the information for processing to a third-party server. Native processing ensures that performance can’t be restricted.
  • If working a service domestically just isn’t potential (e.g., e-mail or internet search), the server ought to nonetheless help a number of avenues of getting on the wanted context by means of competing APIs. For instance, MindsDB capabilities as a gateway to a number of information sources, so as an alternative of counting on only one database to learn and write information, it goes to nice lengths to help a number of databases in a single unified interface, primarily making the backend instruments interchangeable.

Second, our evaluation factors to the truth that present restrictive API entry insurance policies will not be sustainable. Internet scraping and bots, accessed through MCP servers, are most likely getting used (not less than partly) to avoid overly restrictive API entry, complicating the more and more frequent apply of banning bots. Even OpenAI is coloring exterior the API traces, utilizing a third-party service to entry Google Search’s outcomes by means of internet scraping, thereby circumventing its restrictive API.

Increasing structured API entry in a significant means is significant. This ensures that respectable AI automation runs by means of steady, documented finish factors. In any other case, builders resort to brittle browser automation the place privateness and authorization haven’t been correctly addressed. Regulatory steerage may push the market on this route, as with open banking within the US.

Lastly, encouraging larger transparency and disclosure may assist establish the place the bottlenecks within the MCP ecosystem are.

  • Builders working fashionable MCP servers (above a sure utilization threshold) or offering APIs utilized by prime servers ought to report utilization statistics, entry denials, and rate-limiting insurance policies. This information would assist regulators establish rising bottlenecks earlier than they grow to be entrenched. GitHub would possibly facilitate this by encouraging these disclosures, for instance.
  • Moreover, MCP servers above sure utilization thresholds ought to clearly checklist their dependencies on exterior APIs and what fallback choices exist if the first APIs grow to be unavailable. This isn’t solely useful in figuring out the market construction, but additionally important data for safety and robustness for downstream functions.

The purpose is to not eradicate all focus within the community however to make sure that the MCP ecosystem stays contestable, with a number of viable paths for innovation and person alternative. By addressing each technical structure and market dynamics, these recommended tweaks may assist MCP obtain its potential as a democratizing pressure in AI improvement, relatively than merely shifting bottlenecks from one layer to a different.


Footnotes

  1. For this evaluation, we categorized every repo into certainly one of 15 classes utilizing GPT-5 mini. We then human-reviewed and edited the highest 50 servers that make up round 70% of the whole star depend in our dataset.

Appendix

Dataset

The total dataset, together with descriptions of the classes, may be discovered right here (constructed by Sruly Rosenblat):

https://huggingface.co/datasets/sruly/MCP-In-Follow

Limitations

There are a number of limitations to our preliminary analysis:

  • GitHub stars aren’t a measure of obtain counts and even essentially a repo’s reputation.
  • Solely the identify and outline have been used when categorizing repos with the LLM.
  • Categorization was topic to each human and AI errors and lots of servers would doubtless match into a number of classes.
  • We solely used the Pulse checklist for our dataset; different lists had totally different servers (e.g., Browser Use isn’t on mcpmarket.com).
  • We excluded some repos from our evaluation, corresponding to people who had a number of servers and people we weren’t in a position to fetch the star depend for. We might miss some fashionable servers by doing this.

MCP Server Use Over Time

The growth of the top nine repos’ star count over time from MCP’s launch date on November 25, 2024, until September 2025. NOTE: We were only able to track the Browser-Use’s repo until 40,000 stars; hence the flat line for its graph. In reality, roughly 21,000 stars were added over the next few months (the other graphs in this blog are properly adjusted).
The expansion of the highest 9 repos’ star depend over time from MCP’s launch date on November 25, 2024, till September 2025.

Word: We have been solely in a position to monitor Browser Use’s repo till 40,000 stars; therefore the flat line for its graph. In actuality, roughly 21,000 stars have been added over the following few months. (The opposite graphs on this publish are correctly adjusted.)

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles