Epic has filed a “second movement to implement injunction,” asking the US District Courtroom for the Northern District of California to drive Apple to do a well timed evaluate of its Fortnite app and to approve its submission if it is compliant. The corporate just lately accused Apple of blocking Fortnite’s return to the App Retailer in each the US and the EU. Epic submitted the app for approval after successful its case towards the iPhone-maker. Particularly, after the court docket ordered Apple to cease gathering commissions on purchases that weren’t paid by means of the App Retailer and to permit exterior fee hyperlinks in-app.
After Epic mentioned that Apple was blocking Fortnite’s return to the App Retailer, the tech large wrote a letter addressed to the online game developer. In it, Apple mentioned it is not going to take motion on Epic’s submission “till after the Ninth Circuit guidelines on [its] pending request for a partial keep of the brand new injunction.” It instructed Epic to resubmit the app to the EU storefront individually from its US submission. Apple, in fact, filed an attraction towards the court docket’s order to cease charging commissions for funds made exterior the App Retailer. It additionally filed an emergency movement to place a pause on the order prohibiting it from charging commissions, telling the court docket that it’ll value the corporate “substantial sums yearly.”
In a put up on X, Epic mentioned that Apple’s suggestion to submit two totally different variations of Fortnite for evaluate is in violation of its personal guideline that prohibits builders from submitting a number of variations of the identical app. “That’s not the usual Apple holds different builders to and it’s blocking us from releasing our replace within the EU and US,” it wrote. Epic additionally asserted that its submission did not break any guidelines this time. Apple’s denial, the online game developer claimed in its submitting, is a “blatant retaliation towards Epic for difficult Apple’s anticompetitive habits and exposing its lies to the Courtroom, culminating within the Injunction and the Contempt Order.”