What sets apart Google’s Pixel 9 from Samsung’s Galaxy S24 is a tale of two distinct approaches to innovation. The former prioritizes camera prowess and software refinement, while the latter focuses on display technology and hardware upgrades. While both flagships boast impressive specs, it’s clear that each has its own strengths and weaknesses. For instance, the Pixel 9 excels in low-light photography, thanks to its superior image processing capabilities, whereas the Galaxy S24 shines with a larger and more vibrant display.

For several years, telephones have consistently trended towards increasing in size. Compact flagship phones have grown significantly in size to unprecedented dimensions.

As we compare Google’s current Pixel 9 with Samsung’s flagship Galaxy S24 in their purest forms. Today’s smartphones are remarkably compact, meeting all current standards without sacrificing any features from their flagship counterparts within their respective households. The Pixel 9 is the pricier option among the two devices, currently retailing at around €750 for its base model, compared to approximately €650 for a base Galaxy S24.

Desk of Contents:

To get started, you may simply begin using our editor’s evaluation. within the following textual content.

Measurement comparability

While some may view them as compact flagships, each phone is typically considered a standalone device with its own unique features and specifications. While both phones share a relatively compact footprint, the Samsung Galaxy S24 still holds a slight edge in terms of size. It’s shorter, narrower and thinner. Despite the subtle differences in display size, the distinction between the two phones’ diagonals is not a primary consideration – the S24 boasts a 6.2-inch screen, whereas the other model has a similar dimension. The Pixel 9 features a 6.3-inch display. While boasting similar aspect ratios, the S24 appears to make more efficient use of its screen real estate, featuring significantly thinner display bezels compared to the Pixel 9.

One of the most apparent physical differences between the two phones is their weight. Compared to the Galaxy S24’s svelte 167-gram frame, the Pixel 9 tips the scales at nearly 200 grams. The Pixel 9 boasts a significantly upgraded 4,700 mAh battery, a notable improvement over the Galaxy S24’s relatively modest 4,000 mAh capacity. We won’t nitpick the Pixel 9 too harshly about its weight.

The two phones exhibit surprisingly similar design sensibilities, boasting a subtle yet stylish aesthetic that avoids bold statements. Elegant steel frames, precision-crafted with rounded edges for a refined aesthetic, paired with tempered glass backs and fronts that exude modern sophistication, the industry standard. While opinions may vary on the Pixel 9’s digital camera island, some users find it to be a standout feature. Standing proudly apart from the rest of the cellphone’s body, at least to some extent.

Given the relatively identical construction of the two telephones, their supplies appear to be largely uniform, comprising an aluminum body paired with Gorilla Glass Victus 2 panels on both the rear and front facets. While Samsung makes ambitious assertions about its proprietary aluminum, the relevance of this fact remains unclear. All smartphones boast excellent IP68 ingress protection, ensuring they withstand everyday use with ease.

Since that’s a fair moment to assess the overall connection quality between the two phones, let’s do just that. With robust location providers and dual-band GPS capabilities, devices are well-equipped to handle diverse navigation requirements. While both phones offer tri-band Wi-Fi capabilities, the Pixel 9 takes it a step further by supporting the latest Wi-Fi 7 standard, giving users faster and more reliable connectivity, whereas the S24 is limited to Wi-Fi 6e. The phones also feature Bluetooth 5.3 technology with Low Energy assistance, as well as Near Field Communication capabilities. Each phone features a successful USB port, supported by USB 3.2 Gen 1 connectivity with a maximum data transfer rate of 5 Gbps. While this capability is not explicitly documented for the Pixel 9, both phones also support ShowPort video output. Samsung boasts a premium dedicated DeX desktop environment.

Show comparability

While we’ve discussed this previously, the Google Pixel 9’s display is slightly larger than its predecessor’s by a small margin. The Pixel 9 boasts a 6.3-inch diagonal display with a modern 20:9 aspect ratio, while the S24 features a slightly smaller 6.2-inch diagonal and a classic 19.5:9 aspect ratio?

Although each panel has a similar resolution of Full HD+, they boast equivalent sharpness due to their identical pixel densities. The panels also feature a 120Hz dynamic refresh rate. While there’s a notable difference in effectiveness here, specifically, the Galaxy S24 employs LTPO technology for more dynamic refresh rate switching, unlike the Pixel 9.

Telephones tend to advertise remarkably similar display brightness ratings. Notwithstanding our standardized testing revealed that the Pixel 9 Pro boasts a substantial brightness advantage over the Galaxy S24. While it can reach a peak brightness of up to 2,232 nits, its rival, the Galaxy S24, maxes out at approximately 1,401 nits.

Battery life

The anticipated Pixel 9 may boast a slightly bulkier design and increased weight, yet its most notable feature is the substantial 4,700 mAh power source, eclipsing the Galaxy S24’s 4,000 mAh capacity by a considerable margin?

While most smartphones boast reliable battery life considering their size, the Pixel 9 stands out with a notable advantage, boasting an impressive 13:05 hours of active use, marginally surpassing the Galaxy S24’s 12:06 hours of screen-on time.

Charging pace

Both telephones have surprisingly similar charging features. The Pixel 9 supports charging up to 27W via PD 3.0+PPS, while the Galaxy S24 supports charging up to 25W via Samsung’s proprietary Quick Charge technology, also based on PD 3.0+PPS. The phones also support up to 15W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging capabilities.

While sharing a distinct charging profile and power reserve, the Samsung Galaxy S24 exhibits a marginal advantage in terms of battery life. Despite appearing small, this subtlety actually holds significant implications.

Speaker check

Telephones utilise a hybrid stereo speaker system, comprising a dedicated bottom-firing speaker and an amplified earpiece functioning as the second channel. Telephones are designed to handle channel output from the specified audio system effectively, taking into account the system’s orientation and employing intelligent strategies for crosstalk cancellation.

The audio systems on each phone are surprisingly robust, ranking solidly within the Very Good category. While the Pixel 9’s audio quality is on par with others, a subtle edge may be attributed to its superior high-frequency response. While its lows are relatively slender, While the Galaxy S24 is an excellent device in many ways, its audio capabilities are particularly noteworthy.

Efficiency

Both the Google Pixel 9 and Samsung Galaxy S24 are high-end smartphones featuring top-of-the-line processors. The Tesla G4’s underwhelming performance in benchmark tests is a notable disappointment.

The Samsung Galaxy S24 faces a quintessential conundrum, characteristic of the brand’s propensity for complexity. Depending on the retailer from which you acquire your device, it is likely that you will be using either the Samsung Exynos 2400 chipset, as was the case with our review unit, or Qualcomm’s powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor. Regardless of the chipset powering the Galaxy S24, it is expected to significantly outperform the Tensor G4 in benchmark tests. Actual everyday efficiency seems to be on a par with expectations.

Both cellphones lack expandable storage capabilities, and each device comes with a base storage capacity of 128GB, utilizing UFS 3.1 storage chips. The Pixel 9 is also available with 256GB of storage, featuring identical UFS 3.1 read and write speeds. Meanwhile, Samsung leverages early adoption of UFS 4.0 chips in its 256GB and 512GB storage variants.

While the Pixel 9 features a consistent 12GB of RAM across all configurations, the majority of Galaxy S24 models are only equipped with 8GB of RAM, presenting a notable disparity between the two devices.

The extent to which this influences exact efficiency and value is difficult to quantify at present. Assuming Google opted for the increased RAM to enable the Pixel 9 to handle more demanding AI tasks and support advanced native models.

While many corporations are currently embracing AI, it’s challenging to declare unequivocally that giants like Google or Samsung are already profitable in their AI endeavors. With the Pixel 9, users gain a year-long subscription to Google’s advanced Gemini Superior language model, providing unparalleled linguistic capabilities.

Without worrying about software support, whichever phone you choose is unlikely to leave you fretting, as both models are expected to accommodate not less than seven major operating system updates.

Digicam comparability

Each telephones have nice cameras. The Google Pixel 9 boasts a slight edge in hardware, leveraging a larger sensor for its primary camera and a higher-resolution sensor for its ultra-wide lens with autofocus capabilities.

The Samsung Galaxy S24 also boasts a standout feature – its impressive 3x optical telephoto lens, dedicated to delivering exceptional zoom capabilities.

When it comes to video recording capabilities, the S24 stands alone in its ability to capture footage at an impressive 8K resolution. Each telephone is capable of recording video in 4K resolution at either 30 frames per second or 60 frames per second.

Picture high quality

The inaugural digital camera revolutionized photography by allowing users to capture and store images electronically.

The Pixel 9’s camera captures 12.5-megapixel binned images, while the Galaxy S24 settles for a slightly lower 12-megapixel resolution, with no apparent reason why it couldn’t match the Pixel’s output. While there may not be a stark difference between the two devices, the Pixel 9 does boast a distinct advantage over the S24. The body exhibits enhanced features, boasting superior sharpness, significantly reduced noise levels, and a broader dynamic range. While the S24’s color palette offers a subtle expansion of options, the overall range remains modest.

Neither cellphone boasts an impressive ultrawide-angle digital camera. The color rendition and dynamic range are impressive on the Pixel 9, showcasing a notable improvement over previous models. The distinction is marginal, although.

While the Pixel 9 excels in capturing stunning 2x zoomed images with its primary camera, it’s crucial to note that these shouldn’t be compared directly to the 3x telephoto shots from the S24. The S24’s added element of sharpness yields a noticeably enhanced visual experience.

Hence, the Pixel 9 boasts an exceptional digital camera configuration, whereas the S24 excels with a more adaptable sensor array, making for a nuanced comparison.

While the two fundamental cameras appear to be roughly comparable in low-light performance, there is little disparity between them regarding sensor quality and dynamic range. Notwithstanding the Pixel 9’s performance in low-light conditions, its images exhibit significantly reduced noise levels and a marked increase in sharpness. The Pixel 9’s battery life proves to be a notable advantage over its competitors.

Ultrawides struggle to deliver impressive results in low-light conditions. The S24 features an exceptionally sleek design, yet leaves behind a lingering trail of imperfections. While the Pixel 9 handles complex processing tasks effectively, this can result in an unnatural emphasis on darker regions, potentially introducing unwanted artefacts that detract from the overall image quality. The entire scene gives off an air of artificiality.

The Google Pixel 9 boasts the capability to produce remarkably crisp and impressively vivid 2x zoomed-in shots from its primary digital camera. These images likely feature a multitude of distinct elements, accompanied by an almost complete absence of noise. Despite being a mid-range camera, the S24 and its dedicated 3x telephoto lens still manage to capture more detail. Samsung preserves images with minimal processing, resulting in a more authentic and raw representation; however, this may also lead to an abundance of noise on certain surfaces.

Every smartphone boasts impressive, high-quality selfie cameras equipped with advanced autofocus technology. The rivalry between the two is often closely contested, making it difficult to predict a clear winner. While the Pixel 9’s camera excels at capturing nuanced pore details and skin textures, we crave even more accurate, natural-looking skin tones on the Samsung Galaxy S24.

Video high quality

The Samsung Galaxy S24 seemingly holds a minor advantage in terms of capturing high-quality 4K video using its primary camera. While the Pixel 9 may have some additional features, everything simply seems sharper. We particularly appreciate the enhanced color representation.

While ultrawide movies offer a visually stunning experience, their quality is somewhat hit-or-miss. The two cellphones failed to make a significant impact in this category. While the S23 may have its advantages, the S24’s subtle nuances might just give it a slight advantage in certain situations.

When it comes to zoomed movies, the absence of viable competition is a distinct possibility. The S24’s dedicated three-times zoom lens significantly outperforms its rival, the Pixel 9, in terms of telephoto capabilities.

Here are just a few frame grabs from the movies taken by both phones, showcasing all focal sizes for easy comparison between the two devices.

The primary digital camera on the Samsung Galaxy S24 seems capable of capturing slightly better 4K low-light videos. The images are even more sharply defined, with finer details, compared to those produced by the Pixel 9.

Verdict

The decision between the Google Pixel 9 and the Samsung Galaxy S24 presents a genuinely challenging choice. Both of these flagship models exhibit exceptional quality and balance in their design and performance.

quantitatively speaking, the S24 seems to hold a decisive advantage in this comparison. While it’s true that some executives may have varying opinions, there still exist objective measures to determine an executive’s effectiveness. You’ll likely experience higher performance from this device compared to the Google Pixel 9. The Devoted 3x Telephoto Digital Camera stands out for its numerous advantages, including exceptional video recording capabilities that excel across all three cameras, boasting impressive resolution up to 8K. It’s also the lighter and more compact option between the two cellphones. Google’s phones still lack a suitable alternative to Samsung’s DeX (Desktop Experience) feature. At a significantly lower price point, the 256GB variant offers excellent value, essentially providing the same storage capacity as the 128GB Pixel 9 for less.

The Pixel 9, however, is far from being a slowpoke. The primary digital camera’s high-quality image output excelled across all scenarios, with the added benefit of autofocus capabilities on the ultrawide lens. While boasting enhanced battery life and a significantly brighter display, this device delivers an unparalleled outdoor experience, surpassing the competition – particularly the Galaxy – in key areas where it truly shines.

Ultimately, choosing between the two options depends on your priorities. Will both cellphones prove a wise choice, capable of withstanding the test of time, thanks to manufacturers’ commitments to providing up to seven major operating system updates?