Execs
- Low-cost for its specs
- USB-C connection
- The show’s slender profile belies its remarkable resilience.
Cons
- Low brightness and distinction
- Some ghosting
- Not vibrant sufficient for HDR
- The stand’s lack of adjustability leaves users at the mercy of its fixed position, potentially causing discomfort or distraction. Moreover, if it’s too quick to change settings, this can lead to frustration and decreased productivity. Furthermore, the display’s tendency to wobble on the stand is unacceptable, as it may cause screen distortion or even damage over time.
Beware of the allure of discounted products offering a few upgraded features – it’s all too easy to get swept up in the promise of value for money. The Arzopa M1RC, a 27-inch, 1440p display boasting a 180Hz refresh rate and Adaptive Sync, elevates itself beyond the standard 24- or 25-inch, 1080p, 144Hz offerings in the gaming monitor market. For the Arzopa M1RC, shoppers can expect a retail price tag of $269, with street prices starting at just $169 during sales seasons.
The crux of the matter is that specifications are merely a subset of the larger narrative. The M1RC consistently honours its claimed decision and refresh rate, providing crisp and clear visuals for gaming purposes, as well as fluid and responsive movement. Although it might arrive earlier, its pixel response time still produces subtle ghosting effects. However, the remaining expertise is remarkably humble. The construction is underwhelming, the base model stands out as subpar, and the HDR assistance provides no insight into actual HDR performance.
Arzopa M1RC
| Value | $270 |
|---|---|
| Dimension (diagonal) | 27 in/69 cm |
| Panel and backlight | Quick IPS |
| Flat or curved | Flat |
| Decision and pixel density | 2,560×1,440, 108 ppi |
| Facet ratio | 16:9 |
| Most gamut | 100% sRGB, 82% DCI-P3 |
| Brightness (nits, peak) | 350 |
| HDR | HDR10 |
| Adaptive sync | AMD FreeSync |
| Max vertical refresh fee | 180Hz |
| Grey-to-gray response time | 5ms (default), 1ms (Overdrive) |
| Connections | One HDMI 2.0 port, one DisplayPort 1.4 port, and one USB-C port with 15W Power Delivery capabilities. |
| Audio | Headphone jack |
| VESA mountable | Sure, 100×100 mm |
| Panel guarantee | 12-month guarantee |
| Launch date | April 2023 |
Despite perceiving value to be low, a consumer may still be overwhelmed by an abundance of inferior alternatives, potentially discouraging them from exploring other options. However, amidst the ruggedness lies a gemstone quality that far surpasses the Arzopa M1RC, as exemplified by the likes of,, and. While prices can vary, these retailers often offer competitive rates; on some days, they might even be the most affordable option, making them a smart choice to consider.
The Arzopa M1RC essentially inherits all the drawbacks of a fund manager. Sited atop a fundamental pedestal, this fixture remains stationary, offering neither rotational movement nor adjustability for height or angle. You’ll experience a slight upward or downward inclination when looking at something that’s only vertically aligned. Given the need to crane your neck to gaze at the screen, it’s no wonder that using this monitor for extended periods can be quite discomforting from an ergonomic standpoint. To achieve increased peak, one would likely require an additional support structure; however, introducing such an enhancement can swiftly erode the value proposition of the product in question. While regular stands often lack stability, allowing the monitor to wobble significantly when jostled or subjected to minor movements.
While the Arzopa M1RC stands out from the crowd with its unique features, one notable element is its rear-mounted joystick, which allows effortless navigation of settings menus; this premium component is typically more expensive and, unlike the button-heavy interfaces found on budget displays, provides a much more intuitive and user-friendly experience.
Unlike others, the joystick’s single action is counterintuitive – instead of selecting an option, clicking in toggles the monitor on and off; therefore, if you’re trying to adjust settings and accidentally click down on the joystick, you’ll likely become frustrated instantly. There’s limited reason to employ the joystick extensively, apart from toggling between settings. Few settings actually deliver substantial boosts to image resolution. While allowing FreeSync might be necessary, it’s generally recommended to leave the settings at their default values when using the Arzopa M1RC, as this will typically produce optimal results.
Arzopa’s addition of a USB-C port is an unexpected surprise, considering its scarcity in budget-friendly displays – particularly in this price range – allowing for both video input and 15 watts of power delivery to connected devices. That’s joined by two ports: an HDMI 2.0 port and a DisplayPort 1.4 port, offering versatile connectivity options for users. The Arzopa display features a DisplayPort connection, but its compact design and fixed placement on the monitor’s surface make it prone to tangling or kinking when placed on any floor without clean cable routing options.
The monitor’s casing consists of a robust, substantial thickness of plastic that exudes a sense of durability. The panel can be quite slim in design. Yes, would it be beneficial to refine the installation process somewhat – there exist pre-drilled holes on the rear for secure fastening via VESA mounting.
Shade measurements
The Arzopa M1RC offers a range of image modes, albeit none of them meet our expectations for quality. The monitor defaults to its Normal profile with a calibrated brightness level of 80%, equivalent to approximately 254 candelas (nits). Boosted by up to 100 percent, our top-rated display peaked at roughly 290 nits, falling short of its touted 350-nit mark, but the antiglare coating offered some mitigation. The relatively low brightness of this IPS panel results in a somewhat limited ability to produce strong contrast and differentiation between colors. In all respects, this setting arrived at a proper ratio of less than 1000 to one.
While shade may exhibit a slightly cool tone at a white level of 7900K to 8200K depending on the preset, most individuals won’t notice significant variations without finely tuned vision. While delivering an impressive 99% coverage of the sRGB gamut and 83% of the P3 color space, this display’s color accuracy is commendable for its price point. While shade accuracy for most colors remains consistent at an acceptable level, a notable exception arises from a specific shade of blue, which consistently deviates significantly from its intended hue.
Shade efficiency
| Preset | Gamut (% protection) | White level | Gamma | Typical brightness (nits) | Distinction | Accuracy (DE1976 common/max) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal (Default 80% brightness) | 99% (sRGB), 83% (P3) | 7900K | 2.3 | 254 | 810:1 | 0.67/5.64 |
| Normal (100% brightness) | 99% (sRGB), 83% (P3) | 8000K | 2.3 | 274 | 760:1 | 0.6/5.71 |
| Picture | 99% (sRGB), 83% (P3) | 7900K | 2.4 | 139 | 640:1 | 0.84/5.66 |
| Film | 99% (sRGB), 84% (P3) | 8200K | 2.3 | 285 | 850:1 | 1.05/6.36 |
| HDR Normal | 69% (P3) | 10546K | n/a | 239 | Based primarily on a minimum brightness level of approximately 0.34 nits. | n/a |
While Arzopa’s HDR mode on the M1RC does exist, its performance in low-light scenarios falls far short of expectations, being thoroughly underwhelming instead. Enabling this feature significantly reduces the color gamut and peak brightness. Not good. Additionally, this display features a uniquely crisp white point of over 10,000 Kelvin, which might initially lead you to believe the image is more vivid; nonetheless, it merely maintains the visual quality without actually increasing brightness. Notably, I was already somewhat desensitized to the lackluster HDR performance on affordable screens before encountering this issue, having previously witnessed similar visual compromises on another low-cost Arzopa monitor.
The Arzopa M1RC boasts a range of distinct gaming modes, akin to those commonly found in high-performance monitors designed specifically for gamers. Despite this, these offerings yield scant meaningful differentiation for clients. While gamut and distinction remain relatively consistent, the FPS mode exhibits a significant drop-off in contrast ratio, specifically a paltry 520:1 due to over-illuminated blacks. While enabling these options may enhance subtle details in painted and elevated shadows, the added visibility will likely compromise overall visual fidelity.
While occasional gems can be found in affordable items, the reality is that you typically receive what you put forth in terms of investment. While you wouldn’t typically consider the Arzopa M1RC a top-tier option unless it’s discounted, its value proposition changes when prices are slashed and your expectations aren’t too high.
How we examined
The measurements for the Innocn 28C1Q were taken using a SpyderX Elite colorimeter with software designed for standard dynamic range (SDR). Delta E 1976 measurements of shade accuracy are reported using Datacolor’s comprehensive 48-patch test, yielding precise results.
While actual results may vary significantly from those claimed by a manufacturer, this disparity can be attributed to various factors, including differences in colour patch sets, colorimeters, Delta-E calculations, and settings.
